Pain intensity characteristics of referrals to national dementia behavior support programs in Australia. (31st December 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Atee, Mustafa; Lloyd, Rebecca Victoria; Morris, Thomas; Cunningham, Colm
• Is Part Of: Alzheimer's & dementia. Volume 17(2021)Supplement 12
• Page Start: n/a
• Page End: n/a
• Publication Date: 2021-12-31
• Subjects: Alzheimer's disease -- Periodicals; Alzheimer Disease -- Periodicals; Dementia -- Periodicals; Démence; Maladie d'Alzheimer; Périodique électronique (Descripteur de forme); Ressource Internet (Descripteur de forme); 616.83
• DOI: 10.1002/alz.058455
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1552-5260

Abstract

Abstract: Background: Recognizing pain in people with advanced dementia who cannot effectively communicate is difficult. As such, pain is underdetected and undermanaged in this group and can lead to behaviors and psychological symptoms of dementia, impaired quality of life, and significant caregiver distress. Further, little is known about the clinical experience of pain intensity in dementia. This study aims to describe the pain intensity characteristics of referrals to Dementia Support Australia, a national dementia‐specific behavior support program in Australia. Methods: Pain in a sample of referrals (period: January‐November 2020) was evaluated during various activities (rest vs movement) using PainChek ®, a medical device application (app)(Figure 1) linked to a web admin portal (WAP)(Figure 2) for non‐verbal adults including those living with dementia. PainChek ® consists of six domains (Face, Voice, Movement, Behavior, Activity, and Body) that have collectively a total of 42 items. The PainChek ® app uses artificial intelligence to detect pain‐indicative facial action units (e.g., brow lowering) in combination with a digital checklist of non‐facial indicators to produce a pain intensity score as follows: 0‐6 (no pain), 7‐11 (mild pain), 12‐15 (moderate pain), ≥16 (severe pain). The difference in pain scores according to the activity status (rest vs movement) was computed using Cohen's d values (e.g., 0.01‐ <0.50: very small‐to‐small). Results: A sample of 75 referrals (84.2 ± 8.7 y, 50.6% male) from residential aged care homes were included in this study. A total of 79 pain assessments (rest n = 31, post‐movement n = 44, not assigned n = 4) were completed for the sample. Most referrals had a diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease (n = 40, 50.6%), vascular dementia (n = 7, 8.9%) and mixed dementia (n = 8, 10.3%). Over one‐third (n = 29, 36.7%) of the sample had mild pain whilst one‐third (n = 26, 33%) had moderate‐severe pain. Across the sample, four out of six domain scores (Face, Voice, Movement, Activity) were higher after movement compared to rest e.g., Voice ( d = 0.34) and Behavior ( d = 0.38). Conclusion: Higher pain intensities are prevalent in referrals with dementia, particularly after movement‐based activities, warranting the need for analgesic treatments.