Comparison of three different definitions of low disease activity in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus and their prognostic utilities. (13th August 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Kang, Ji-Hyoun; Shin, Min-Ho; Choi, Sung-Eun; Xu, Haimuzi; Park, Dong-Jin; Lee, Shin-Seok
• Is Part Of: Rheumatology. Volume 60:Number 2(2021)
• Page Start: 762
• Page End: 766
• Publication Date: 2020-08-13
• Subjects: systemic lupus erythematosus -- disease activity -- damage -- flare -- quality of life; Rheumatism -- Periodicals; Rheumatology -- Periodicals; 616.723005
• DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/keaa407
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1462-0324

Abstract

Abstract: Objectives: Three definitions of low-level disease activity in patients with SLE have been proposed by different groups. These include minimal disease activity (MDA), low disease activity (LDA) and the lupus low disease activity state (LLDAS). We investigated the performance of these definitions in SLE patients. Methods: We recruited 299 SLE patients who were followed up annually for 4 consecutive years. We compared the three definitions of low disease activity via longitudinal analysis; we used a generalized, linear-mixed effects model and generalized estimating equations. Results: The LLDAS was significantly associated with a lower SLICC/ACR damage index (β coefficient=−0.064, 95% CI: −0.129, −0.002, P =0.050), reduced flare (odds ratio = 0.090, 95% CI: 0.034, 0.239, P <0.001), an improved SF-36 physical component score (β coefficient=0.782, 95% CI: 0.046, 1.519, P =0.037), and an improved SF-36 mental component score (β coefficient=1.522, 95% CI: 0.496, 2.547, P =0.004). Neither the MDA nor the LDA were associated with these variables. Conclusion: The LLDAS definition performs better than the MDA and LDA definitions, showing that LLDAS is associated with less organ damage and flare, and a better quality of life, during follow-up.