Efficacy of Intraoperative Neuromonitoring Using Transcranial Motor-Evoked Potentials for Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy: A Prospective Multicenter Study by the Monitoring Committee of the Japanese Society for Spine Surgery and Related Research. Issue 1 (1st January 2022)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Efficacy of Intraoperative Neuromonitoring Using Transcranial Motor-Evoked Potentials for Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy: A Prospective Multicenter Study by the Monitoring Committee of the Japanese Society for Spine Surgery and Related Research. Issue 1 (1st January 2022)
- Main Title:
- Efficacy of Intraoperative Neuromonitoring Using Transcranial Motor-Evoked Potentials for Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy
- Authors:
- Funaba, Masahiro
Kanchiku, Tsukasa
Yoshida, Go
Imagama, Shiro
Kawabata, Shigenori
Fujiwara, Yasushi
Ando, Muneharu
Yamada, Kei
Taniguchi, Shinichirou
Iwasaki, Hiroshi
Tadokoro, Nobuaki
Takahashi, Masahito
Wada, Kanichiro
Yamamoto, Naoya
Shigematsu, Hideki
Kobayashi, Kazuyoshi
Yasuda, Akimasa
Ushirozako, Hiroki
Ando, Kei
Hashimoto, Jun
Morito, Shinji
Takatani, Tsunenori
Tani, Toshikazu
Matsuyama, Yukihiro - Abstract:
- Abstract : Study Design: A prospective multicenter observational study. Objective: To elucidate the efficacy of transcranial motor-evoked potentials (Tc(E)-MEPs) in degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM) surgery by comparing cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) to cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL) and investigate the timing of Tc(E)-MEPs alerts and types of interventions affecting surgical outcomes. Summary of Background Data: Although CSM and OPLL are the most commonly encountered diseases of DCM, the benefits of Tc(E)-MEPs for DCM remain unclear and comparisons of these two diseases have not yet been conducted. Methods: We examined the results of Tc(E)-MEPs from 1176 DCM cases (840 CSM /336 OPLL) and compared patients background by disease, preoperative motor deficits, and the type of surgical procedure. We also assessed the efficacy of interventions based on Tc(E)-MEPs alerts. Tc(E)-MEPs alerts were defined as an amplitude reduction of more than 70% below the control waveform. Rescue cases were defined as those in which waveform recovery was achieved after interventions in response to alerts and no postoperative paralysis. Results: Overall sensitivity was 57.1%, and sensitivity was higher with OPLL (71.4%) than with CSM (42.9%). The sensitivity of acute onset segmental palsy including C5 palsy was 40% (OPLL/CSM: 66.7%/0%) whereas that of lower limb palsy was 100%. The most common timing of Tc(E)-MEPs alerts was during decompressionAbstract : Study Design: A prospective multicenter observational study. Objective: To elucidate the efficacy of transcranial motor-evoked potentials (Tc(E)-MEPs) in degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM) surgery by comparing cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) to cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL) and investigate the timing of Tc(E)-MEPs alerts and types of interventions affecting surgical outcomes. Summary of Background Data: Although CSM and OPLL are the most commonly encountered diseases of DCM, the benefits of Tc(E)-MEPs for DCM remain unclear and comparisons of these two diseases have not yet been conducted. Methods: We examined the results of Tc(E)-MEPs from 1176 DCM cases (840 CSM /336 OPLL) and compared patients background by disease, preoperative motor deficits, and the type of surgical procedure. We also assessed the efficacy of interventions based on Tc(E)-MEPs alerts. Tc(E)-MEPs alerts were defined as an amplitude reduction of more than 70% below the control waveform. Rescue cases were defined as those in which waveform recovery was achieved after interventions in response to alerts and no postoperative paralysis. Results: Overall sensitivity was 57.1%, and sensitivity was higher with OPLL (71.4%) than with CSM (42.9%). The sensitivity of acute onset segmental palsy including C5 palsy was 40% (OPLL/CSM: 66.7%/0%) whereas that of lower limb palsy was 100%. The most common timing of Tc(E)-MEPs alerts was during decompression (63.16%), followed by screw insertion (15.79%). The overall rescue rate was 57.9% (OPLL/CSM: 58.3%/57.1%). Conclusion: Since Tc(E)-MEPs are excellent for detecting long tract injuries, surgeons need to consider appropriate interventions in response to alerts. The detection of acute onset segmental palsy by Tc(E)-MEPs was partially possible with OPLL, but may still be difficult with CSM. The rescue rate was higher than 50% and appropriate interventions may have prevented postoperative neurological complications. Level of Evidence: 3 Abstract : Since transcranial motor-evoked potentials (Tc(E)-MEPs) for degenerative cervical myelopathy are excellent for detecting long tract injuries, surgeons need to consider appropriate interventions in response to Tc(E)-MEPs alerts. The detection of acute onset segmental palsy by Tc(E)-MEPs was partially possible with ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament, but may still be difficult with cervical spondylotic myelopathy. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Spine. Volume 47:Issue 1(2022)
- Journal:
- Spine
- Issue:
- Volume 47:Issue 1(2022)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 47, Issue 1 (2022)
- Year:
- 2022
- Volume:
- 47
- Issue:
- 1
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2022-0047-0001-0000
- Page Start:
- Page End:
- Publication Date:
- 2022-01-01
- Subjects:
- cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament -- cervical spondylotic myelopathy -- intraoperative neuromonitoring -- postoperative paralysis
Spine -- Abnormalities -- Periodicals
Spine -- Diseases -- Periodicals
Spine -- Surgery -- Periodicals
616.73005 - Journal URLs:
- http://gateway.ovid.com/ovidweb.cgi?T=JS&MODE=ovid&NEWS=n&PAGE=toc&D=ovft&AN=00007632-000000000-00000 ↗
http://journals.lww.com/spinejournal/pages/default.aspx ↗
http://www.spinejournal.com/ ↗
http://journals.lww.com ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1097/BRS.0000000000004156 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0362-2436
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 8413.903000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 25846.xml