Development of attenuation correction methods using deep learning in brain‐perfusion single‐photon emission computed tomography. Issue 8 (28th June 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Murata, Taisuke; Yokota, Hajime; Yamato, Ryuhei; Horikoshi, Takuro; Tsuneda, Masato; Kurosawa, Ryuna; Hashimoto, Takuma; Ota, Joji; Sawada, Koichi; Iimori, Takashi; Masuda, Yoshitada; Mori, Yasukuni; Suyari, Hiroki; Uno, Takashi
• Is Part Of: Medical physics. Volume 48:Issue 8(2021)
• Page Start: 4177
• Page End: 4190
• Publication Date: 2021-06-28
• Subjects: attenuation correction -- computed tomography -- deep learning -- radiation -- single‐photon emission computed tomography; Medical physics -- Periodicals; Medical physics; Geneeskunde; Natuurkunde; Toepassingen; Biophysics; Periodicals; Periodicals; Electronic journals; 610.153
• DOI: 10.1002/mp.15016
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0094-2405

Abstract

Abstract : Purpose: Computed tomography (CT)‐based attenuation correction (CTAC) in single‐photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) is highly accurate, but it requires hybrid SPECT/CT instruments and additional radiation exposure. To obtain attenuation correction (AC) without the need for additional CT images, a deep learning method was used to generate pseudo‐CT images has previously been reported, but it is limited because of cross‐modality transformation, resulting in misalignment and modality‐specific artifacts. This study aimed to develop a deep learning‐based approach using non‐attenuation‐corrected (NAC) images and CTAC‐based images for training to yield AC images in brain‐perfusion SPECT. This study also investigated whether the proposed approach is superior to conventional Chang's AC (ChangAC). Methods: In total, 236 patients who underwent brain‐perfusion SPECT were randomly divided into two groups: the training group (189 patients; 80%) and the test group (47 patients; 20%). Two models were constructed using Autoencoder (AutoencoderAC) and U‐Net (U‐NetAC), respectively. ChangAC, AutoencoderAC, and U‐NetAC approaches were compared with CTAC using qualitative analysis (visual evaluation) and quantitative analysis (normalized mean squared error [NMSE] and the percentage error in each brain region). Statistical analyses were performed using the Wilcoxon signed‐rank sum test and Bland‐Altman analysis. Results: U‐NetAC had the highest visual evaluation score. The NMSE results for the U‐NetAC were the lowest, followed by AutoencoderAC and ChangAC ( P < 0.001). Bland‐Altman analysis showed a fixed bias for ChangAC and AutoencoderAC and a proportional bias for ChangAC. ChangAC underestimated counts by 30–40% in all brain regions. AutoencoderAC and U‐NetAC produced mean errors of <1% and maximum errors of 3%, respectively. Conclusion: New deep learning‐based AC methods for AutoencoderAC and U‐NetAC were developed. Their accuracy was higher than that obtained by ChangAC. U‐NetAC exhibited higher qualitative and quantitative accuracy than AutoencoderAC. We generated highly accurate AC images directly from NAC images without the need for intermediate pseudo‐CT images. To verify our models' generalizability, external validation is required.