Differential speech and language characteristics across neurodegenerative disorders. (31st December 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Robin, Jessica; Xu, Mengdan; DeSouza, Danielle D; Gupta, Anoopum S; Kaufman, Liam D; Simpson, Bill
• Is Part Of: Alzheimer's & dementia. Volume 17(2021)Supplement 11
• Page Start: n/a
• Page End: n/a
• Publication Date: 2021-12-31
• Subjects: Alzheimer's disease -- Periodicals; Alzheimer Disease -- Periodicals; Dementia -- Periodicals; Démence; Maladie d'Alzheimer; Périodique électronique (Descripteur de forme); Ressource Internet (Descripteur de forme); 616.83
• DOI: 10.1002/alz.052264
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1552-5260

Abstract

Abstract: Background: Speech and language changes have been reported to occur across a range of neurodegenerative disorders, including Alzheimer's Disease (AD), Frontotemporal Dementia (FTD) and Parkinson's Disease (PD). Characterizing and quantifying such changes will enable the development of novel speech‐based measures to identify and monitor disease remotely and non‐invasively. In order to determine if such measures are disease‐specific, it is important to compare speech and language changes across different neurological conditions. In this study, we identify speech and language characteristics that are differentially affected across AD, FTD and PD populations. Method: In this cross‐study comparison, we pooled data from normative studies of older adults (N = 299), and studies of individuals with a clinical diagnosis of AD (N = 895), FTD (N = 43) or PD (N = 42). In all studies, speech was recorded as participants performed a picture description task, in which they were shown a line drawing of a scene and asked to describe everything they saw in the picture. Speech samples were transcribed and analyzed, producing >500 acoustic and linguistic variables describing the characteristics of the speech sound and content. Speech variables were compared across groups using ANOVAs with a factor of diagnosis group, and significant group effects (p < 0.05) were further examined with pairwise group comparisons. Result: Speech variables showing common or differential effects according to diagnosis were identified in this exploratory cross‐study comparison. Speech variables relating to the ease of speech production, including speech rate and number of pauses, were affected in all three diseases when compared to control participants. Select acoustic variables, including mean intensity and zero‐crossing rate, showed the greatest differences in PD compared to FTD or AD. Individuals with AD and FTD produced picture descriptions with less relevant information content. Select lexical variables, including pronoun and preposition use, were selectively affected in AD but not FTD or PD. Conclusion: This study indicates that speech and language characteristics, derived from a picture description task, were differentially affected in AD, FTD, and PD. We found evidence for acoustic changes in PD, consistent with motor speech impairments, and linguistic changes in AD and FTD, consistent with cognitive impairments.