Association of neighborhood socioeconomic disadvantage and cognitive decline. (31st December 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Marsh, Karyn; Shao, Yongzhao; Zhang, Yian; Masurkar, Arjun V; Vedvyas, Alok; Chodosh, Joshua
• Is Part Of: Alzheimer's & dementia. Volume 17(2021)Supplement 10
• Page Start: n/a
• Page End: n/a
• Publication Date: 2021-12-31
• Subjects: Alzheimer's disease -- Periodicals; Alzheimer Disease -- Periodicals; Dementia -- Periodicals; Démence; Maladie d'Alzheimer; Périodique électronique (Descripteur de forme); Ressource Internet (Descripteur de forme); 616.83
• DOI: 10.1002/alz.056584
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1552-5260

Abstract

Abstract: Background: There is increasing emphasis on research recruitment of persons of color to understand the influence of race/ethnicity on Alzheimer's disease (AD) and AD‐related dementia (ADRD) risk. Normal persons with subjective cognitive decline (SCD) are considered at risk for future decline as SCD is thought to be a preclinical stage of AD/ADRD. Yet the validity of SCD across racial and ethnic groups is unclear. Race/ethnicity‐related conditions such as socio‐economic disadvantage, neighborhood segregation, and poor housing quality (neighborhood deprivation) are important factors in stress, discrimination and other social determinants of health and may provide more in‐depth explanations for SCD than race/ethnicity alone. Method: We examined the role of neighborhood deprivation and compared this to the role of race/ethnicity in SCD using a validated instrument, the Brief Cognitive Rating Scale (BCRS). Using the Area Deprivation Index (ADI), we cross‐sectionally examined the relationship between neighborhood characteristics and SCD in a racially and ethnically diverse group of community‐residing older adults in New York City. For those having available addresses, we used data from participants with normal cognition in the NYU Alzheimer's Disease Research Center (n=313) and conducted multivariable logistic regressions, comparing two models with the BCRS as our outcome: using the ADI without race/ethnicity and then with race/ethnicity, both adjusting for age, sex, education (years). Result: Participant mean age was 72.8.0 ± 7.4 years; mean education was 16.3± 3.1 years. Seventy‐six percent of the cohort was female (n=232); 12.1% (n= 38) reported as Hispanic, 73.5% (n=230) non‐Hispanic (NH) White; 13.4% reported as NH Black or African‐American (n=42); and 3 were other. In multivariable logistic regressions of BCRS domain‐specific analysis, ADI was a significant predictor of BCRS‐measured SCD even when race/ethnicity was included as a covariate (p<0.05), suggesting independent influence of neighborhood deprivation. Conclusion: Neighborhood characteristics may play an influential role in SCD regardless of race/ethnicity and thus are likely important risk factors for AD/ADRD. If larger and more diverse studies generate similar findings, neighborhood investment and recruitment goals for AD/ADRD studies will require more focus on neighborhoods with greater deprivation.