Racial‐ethnic differences in baseline and longitudinal change in neuropsychological test scores in the NACC Uniform Data Set 3.0. (31st December 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Chan, Kwun Chuen Gary; Barnes, Lisa L.; Saykin, Andrew J.; Sano, Mary; Au, Rhoda; Craft, Suzanne; Teylan, Merilee A.; Levey, Allan I; Weintraub, Sandra; Kukull, Walter A.; Dodge, Hiroko H
• Is Part Of: Alzheimer's & dementia. Volume 17(2021)Supplement 6
• Page Start: n/a
• Page End: n/a
• Publication Date: 2021-12-31
• Subjects: Alzheimer's disease -- Periodicals; Alzheimer Disease -- Periodicals; Dementia -- Periodicals; Démence; Maladie d'Alzheimer; Périodique électronique (Descripteur de forme); Ressource Internet (Descripteur de forme); 616.83
• DOI: 10.1002/alz.054653
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1552-5260

Abstract

Abstract: Background: Racial/ethnic differences in cross‐sectional assessment of cognitive test performance are well known. However, longitudinal studies of differences in cognitive decline have been mixed. The purpose of this study was to examine racial/ethnic differences in baseline and longitudinal change on the Uniform Data Set (UDS) version 3 of the NIA Alzheimer's Disease Research Centers program. Method: Longitudinal data from 2, 806 participants (2336 non‐Hispanic White, 350 non‐Hispanic Black, 120 Hispanics tested in Spanish) were acquired from the National Alzheimer's Coordinating Center (NACC), and included baseline and at least two follow‐up visits. We used marginal linear regression models to examine racial/ethnic differences in standardized test scores, by including racial group indicators, time (in years) since initial visit and their interaction, controlling for baseline age, sex, education and changes in global CDR scores during the follow‐up. Additional models examining longitudinal change also controlled for baseline score. The outcome variables included the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA, Number Span (Forward/Backward), Craft Story 21 Recall (Immediate/Delayed), Multilingual Naming Test (MINT), Category Naming (animals and vegetables), Trail Making A and B, and Benson Figure (Copy/Recall). Estimates were obtained from generalized estimating equations with an exchangeable working correlation, and robust standard errors were used to construct confidence intervals and compute p‐values. Result: Black and Hispanic participants had lower baseline scores on all tests (difference in standard deviation units: ‐0.029 to ‐0.858 for blacks, and ‐0.014 to ‐1.214 for Hispanics), but showed attenuated decline on all tests (difference in standard deviation units per year: 0.002 to 0.102 for blacks, 0.022 to 0.296 for Hispanics) compared to non‐Hispanic Whites. When baseline test scores were controlled, the differences in longitudinal changes became mostly statistically non‐significant. Conclusion: Despite large racial/ethnic differences in baseline test scores, there were no racial/ethnic differences in longitudinal change over time once baseline differences were controlled. Further, results suggest that the utility of baseline test scores in UDS version 3 to predict longitudinal change may not be compromised in racially diverse populations.