A cognitive composite for genetic frontotemporal dementia: GENFI‐cog. (31st December 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Poos, Jackie M.; Nicholas, Jennifer M; Moore, Katrina M; Russell, Lucy L; Peakman, Georgia; Jiskoot, Lize C.; van den Berg, Esther; Papma, Janne M.; Seelaar, Harro; Pijnenburg, Yolande A.L.; Moreno, Fermin; Sanchez‐Valle, Raquel; Borroni, Barbara; Laforce, Robert; Masellis, Mario; Tartaglia, Maria Carmela; Graff, Caroline; Galimberti, Daniela; Rowe, James B; Finger, Elizabeth; Synofzik, Matthis; Vandenberghe, Rik; Mendonca, Alexandre; Tagliavini, Fabrizio; Santana, Isabel; Ducharme, Simon; Butler, Christopher; Gerhard, Alexander; Levin, Johannes; Danek, Adrian; Otto, Markus; van Swieten, John C; Rohrer, Jonathan D;
• Is Part Of: Alzheimer's & dementia. Volume 17(2021)Supplement 6
• Page Start: n/a
• Page End: n/a
• Publication Date: 2021-12-31
• Subjects: Alzheimer's disease -- Periodicals; Alzheimer Disease -- Periodicals; Dementia -- Periodicals; Démence; Maladie d'Alzheimer; Périodique électronique (Descripteur de forme); Ressource Internet (Descripteur de forme); 616.83
• DOI: 10.1002/alz.055117
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1552-5260

Abstract

Abstract: Background: Development of endpoints for clinical trials in frontotemporal dementia (FTD) is increasingly urgent. In other neurodegenerative diseases composite scores are often used as outcome measures but are, as of yet, lacking in FTD. The aim of this study was to create gene‐specific cognitive composite scores for MAPT, GRN and C9orf72 mutation carriers and provide recommendations on recruitment and trial duration. Method: 69 C9orf72, 41 GRN, 28 MAPT mutation carriers with a CDR® plus NACC‐FTLD global score ≥0.5 and 275 controls completed a neuropsychological battery covering five cognitive domains. Logistic regression was used to identify the combination of tests that discriminated best between mutation carrier groups and controls. Weighted averages of the test scores in the models were calculated based on the regression coefficients (GENFI‐cog). Sample size estimates were calculated for individual tests and composite. The treatment effect was estimated as the mean difference between CDR® plus NACC‐FTLD 0.5 and 1 groups. Time‐to‐event analysis was used to determine the fraction of patients within GENFI that converted from CDR® plus NACC‐FTLD 0.5 to ≥1. Result: The most sensitive model in C9orf72 mutation carriers included a combination of executive, social cognitive and visuoconstructive tests (Table 1). A combination of executive, social cognitive, semantic and memory tests was most sensitive in GRN mutation carriers, and a combination of social cognitive, attention, semantic and memory tests in MAPT mutation carriers, resulted in the most sensitive model. The estimated sample size to detect a treatment effect was lower for the composite than for most individual tests (Table 2). A Kaplan‐Meier curve (Figure 1) showed that after three years 50% of individuals convert from CDR® plus NACC‐FTLD global score 0.5 to 1 or more. Conclusion: We created gene‐specific cognitive composite scores for C9orf72, GRN and MAPT mutation carriers (GENFI‐cog) which resulted in substantially lower estimated sample sizes to detect a treatment effect than most individual cognitive tests. Only 50% of patients with a CDR® plus NACC‐FTLD of 0.5 convert to ≥1 in a three‐year period. GENFI‐cog has potential as a cognitive endpoint for upcoming trials and the results from this study provide important information concerning trial duration and sample sizes.