Time and Clerical Burden Posed by the Current Electronic Health Record for Orthopaedic Surgeons. Issue 1 (1st January 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Kesler, Kyle; Wynn, Malynda; Pugely, Andrew J.
• Is Part Of: Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Volume 30:Issue 1(2022)
• Publication Date: 2022-01-01
• Subjects: Orthopedics -- Periodicals; Orthopedic surgery -- Periodicals; Joint Diseases -- Periodicals; Orthopedics -- Periodicals; Orthopedic surgery; Orthopedics; Periodicals; 616.7005
• DOI: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-21-00094
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1067-151X

Abstract

Abstract : Introduction: The electronic health record (EHR) has become an integral part of modern medical practice. The balance of benefit versus burden of a required EHR remains inconclusive, with many studies identifying increasing physician burnout and less face-to-face patient contact because of increasing documentation demands. Few studies have investigated EHR burden in orthopaedic surgery practice. This study aimed to characterize and compare EHR usage patterns and time allocation within EHR between orthopaedic surgeons, other surgeons, and medicine physicians at an academic medical center. Methods: EHR usage was digitally tracked within a large academic medical center. EHR usage data were compiled for all physicians seeing outpatients from April 2018 to June 2019. The tracking metrics included time spent answering messages, typing notes, reviewing laboratories and imaging, reading notes, and placing orders. Physicians were subdivided between orthopaedic surgeons, other surgeons, and nonsurgeon/medical specialties. Statistical comparisons using a two-sample t -test were done between orthopaedic surgeon EHR usage patterns and other surgeons, in addition to orthopaedic surgeons versus nonsurgeons. Results: One thousand sixty physicians including 28 full-time orthopaedic surgeons, 134 other surgeons, and 898 nonsurgical medicine physicians met inclusion criteria. Orthopaedic surgeons saw on average 31 patients per office day compared with other surgeons at 18 patients per office day ( P < 0.01) and nonsurgeons at 12 patients per office day ( P < 0.01). Orthopaedic surgeons received more EHR messages while also being more efficient at answering EHR messages compared with other surgeons and nonsurgeons ( P < 0.01). EHR tasks, including answering messages, placing orders, chart review, writing notes, and reviewing imaging, consumed 58% of an orthopaedic surgeon's scheduled office day with the largest contribution from required note writing. Discussion: In academic orthopaedic practice, EHR use has surpassed face-to-face patient time, consuming 58% of orthopaedic surgeons' clinical days. With the previously shown correlation between EHR burden and physician burnout, targeted interventions to increase efficiency and off-load EHR burden are necessary to sustain a successful orthopaedic practice.