Cumulative 5-year Results of a Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Biological Mesh With Primary Perineal Wound Closure After Extralevator Abdominoperineal Resection (BIOPEX-study). Issue 1 (January 2022)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Cumulative 5-year Results of a Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Biological Mesh With Primary Perineal Wound Closure After Extralevator Abdominoperineal Resection (BIOPEX-study). Issue 1 (January 2022)
- Main Title:
- Cumulative 5-year Results of a Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Biological Mesh With Primary Perineal Wound Closure After Extralevator Abdominoperineal Resection (BIOPEX-study)
- Authors:
- Blok, Robin D.
Sharabiany, Sarah
Stoker, Jaap
Laan, Ellen T. M.
Bosker, Robbert J. I.
Burger, Jacobus W. A.
Chaudhri, Sanjay
van Duijvendijk, Peter
van Etten, Boudewijn
van Geloven, Anna A. W.
de Graaf, Eelco J. R.
Hoff, Christiaan
Hompes, Roel
Leijtens, Jeroen W. A.
Rothbarth, Joost
Rutten, Harm J. T.
Singh, Baljit
Vuylsteke, Ronald J. C. L. M.
de Wilt, Johannes H. W.
Dijkgraaf, Marcel G. W.
Bemelman, Willem A.
Musters, Gijsbert D.
Tanis, Pieter J. - Abstract:
- Abstract : Objective: To determine long-term outcomes of a randomized trial (BIOPEX) comparing biological mesh and primary perineal closure in rectal cancer patients after extralevator abdominoperineal resection and preoperative radiotherapy, with a primary focus on symptomatic perineal hernia. Summary Background Data: BIOPEX is the only randomized trial in this field, which was negative on its primary endpoint (30-day wound healing). Methods: This was a posthoc secondary analysis of patients randomized in the BIOPEX trial to either biological mesh closure (n = 50; 2 dropouts) or primary perineal closure (n = 54; 1 dropout). Patients were followed for 5 years. Actuarial 5-year probabilities were determined by the Kaplan-Meier statistic. Results: Actuarial 5-year symptomatic perineal hernia rates were 7% (95% CI, 0–30) after biological mesh closure versus 30% (95% CI, 10–49) after primary closure ( P = 0.006). One patient (2%) in the biomesh group underwent elective perineal hernia repair, compared to 7 patients (13%) in the primary closure group ( P = 0.062). Reoperations for small bowel obstruction were necessary in 1/48 patients (2%) and 5/53 patients (9%), respectively ( P = 0.208). No significant differences were found for chronic perineal wound problems, locoregional recurrence, overall survival, and main domains of quality of life and functional outcome. Conclusions: Symptomatic perineal hernia rate at 5-year follow-up after abdominoperineal resection for rectal cancerAbstract : Objective: To determine long-term outcomes of a randomized trial (BIOPEX) comparing biological mesh and primary perineal closure in rectal cancer patients after extralevator abdominoperineal resection and preoperative radiotherapy, with a primary focus on symptomatic perineal hernia. Summary Background Data: BIOPEX is the only randomized trial in this field, which was negative on its primary endpoint (30-day wound healing). Methods: This was a posthoc secondary analysis of patients randomized in the BIOPEX trial to either biological mesh closure (n = 50; 2 dropouts) or primary perineal closure (n = 54; 1 dropout). Patients were followed for 5 years. Actuarial 5-year probabilities were determined by the Kaplan-Meier statistic. Results: Actuarial 5-year symptomatic perineal hernia rates were 7% (95% CI, 0–30) after biological mesh closure versus 30% (95% CI, 10–49) after primary closure ( P = 0.006). One patient (2%) in the biomesh group underwent elective perineal hernia repair, compared to 7 patients (13%) in the primary closure group ( P = 0.062). Reoperations for small bowel obstruction were necessary in 1/48 patients (2%) and 5/53 patients (9%), respectively ( P = 0.208). No significant differences were found for chronic perineal wound problems, locoregional recurrence, overall survival, and main domains of quality of life and functional outcome. Conclusions: Symptomatic perineal hernia rate at 5-year follow-up after abdominoperineal resection for rectal cancer was significantly lower after biological mesh closure. Biological mesh closure did not improve quality of life or functional outcomes. Abstract : Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Annals of surgery. Volume 275:Issue 1(2022)
- Journal:
- Annals of surgery
- Issue:
- Volume 275:Issue 1(2022)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 275, Issue 1 (2022)
- Year:
- 2022
- Volume:
- 275
- Issue:
- 1
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2022-0275-0001-0000
- Page Start:
- Page End:
- Publication Date:
- 2022-01
- Subjects:
- abdominoperineal resection -- biological mesh closure -- perineal hernia -- perineal wound healing -- primary perineal wound closure -- quality of life -- sexual function -- urinary function
Surgery -- Periodicals
617.005 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.annalsofsurgery.com ↗
http://journals.lww.com ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1097/SLA.0000000000004763 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0003-4932
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 1044.500000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library STI - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 25827.xml