Stimulating boundary crossing learning in a multi-stakeholder learning environment for sustainable development. Issue 8 (13th January 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Oonk, Carla; Gulikers, Judith; den Brok, Perry; Mulder, Martin
• Is Part Of: International journal of sustainability in higher education. Volume 23:Issue 8(2022)
• Page Start: 21
• Page End: 40
• Publication Date: 2022-01-13
• Subjects: Boundary crossing -- Higher education -- Transdisciplinary learning -- Interdisciplinary -- Multi-stakeholder learning environment -- Sustainability; Environmental education -- Periodicals; Environmental responsibility -- Study and teaching (Higher) -- Periodicals; Sustainable development -- Periodicals; 333.70711
• DOI: 10.1108/IJSHE-04-2021-0156
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1467-6370

Abstract

Abstract : Purpose: Sustainable development requires multiple stakeholders to work and learn across practices, in other words, it requires boundary crossing competence. To prepare students for their future sustainability professions, higher education should facilitate the development of boundary crossing competence in its curricula. This study aims to confirm whether boundary crossing learning can be stimulated by workshop-based support in multi-stakeholder projects. Design/methodology/approach: This quasi-experimental intervention study (N = 122) investigates the effect of a series of supporting workshops on students' boundary crossing learning in multi-stakeholder projects. The workshops allowed students to adopt four learning mechanisms (identification, coordination, reflection and transformation) theorised to stimulate learning across boundaries between practices. Students followed zero, one, or two workshops. By analysing the student learning reports, the study examines the effect of the workshop intervention on students' self-efficacy for stakeholder collaboration, the number of reported student-stakeholder collaborative activities and the reported boundary crossing learning mechanisms. Findings: The results show that a series of two workshops increase the number of reported collaborative activities and activates the students' boundary crossing learning in terms of reflection and transformation. Research limitations/implications: These findings support the evidence-based design of multi-stakeholder learning environments for sustainable development and contribute to the body of knowledge regarding learning across practices. Originality/value: Boundary crossing competence receives increasing attention as an asset for sustainable development. The added value of this study lies in its confirmation that the boundary crossing theory can be translated into directed educational support that can stimulate students' boundary crossing learning.