Feasibility of Adjacent Insulin Infusion and Continuous Glucose Monitoring via the Medtronic Combo-Set. (March 2013)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: O'Neal, David N.; Adhya, Sumona; Jenkins, Alicia; Ward, Glenn; Welsh, John B.; Voskanyan, Gayane
• Is Part Of: Journal of diabetes science and technology. Volume 7:Number 2(2013)
• Page Start: 381
• Page End: 388
• Publication Date: 2013-03
• Subjects: accuracy -- colocalization -- continuous glucose monitoring -- glucose sensing -- insulin delivery; Diabetes -- Periodicals; Medical technology -- Periodicals; Diabetes Mellitus -- Periodicals; 616.462005
• DOI: 10.1177/193229681300700214
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1932-2968

Abstract

Background: Subcutaneously infused insulin may interfere with the function of nearby glucose-sensing electrodes and vice versa . The prototype of the Combo-Set device (Medtronic) incorporates a subcutaneous insulin delivery catheter and continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) sensor assembled on the same platform and separated by 11 mm. We aim to evaluate Combo-Set's insulin delivery and glucose-sensing functions. Methods: Ten subjects with type 1 diabetes wore a Combo-Set and a Sof-Sensor inserted subcutaneously in contralateral abdominal areas connected to i Pro recorders (Medtronic) for 53.25 ± 0.75 h (mean ± standard deviation). The Combo-Set delivered insulin diluent except during meal tests on days 1 and 3 when insulin lispro was delivered as a meal bolus and postmeal basal. Venous plasma samples were collected at the following time points from meal start: 0, 30, 60, 120, and 180 min for insulin measurements. The accuracy of the Combo-Set sensors was evaluated and compared with that of the Sof-Sensor, with each referenced against capillary glucose values (Contour Link Meter, Bayer). Results: Accuracy of the Combo-Set sensor was comparable to that of the Sof-Sensor. Clarke error grid analysis showed that 97% of Combo-Set and 93% of Sof-Sensor values were in the A+B regions ( p = .20, not significant). The Combo-Set showed the expected postbolus peak insulin time (67 ± 9 min, mean ± standard error). One "no delivery" alarm occurred during the 21 patient days of use. Conclusion: A device providing for simultaneous adjacent placement of an insulin infusion catheter and a CGM sensor is feasible and functions within acceptable limits. The low "no delivery" alarm rate was similar to that of other infusion sets.