N‐terminal pro‐B‐type natriuretic peptide testing patterns in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction. (16th December 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Januzzi, James L.; Tan, Xi; Yang, Lingfeng; Brady, Joanne E.; Yang, Mei; Banka, Puja; Lautsch, Dominik
• Is Part Of: ESC heart failure. Volume 9:Number 1(2022)
• Page Start: 87
• Page End: 99
• Publication Date: 2021-12-16
• Subjects: Natriuretic peptide, brain -- N‐terminal pro‐B‐type natriuretic peptide -- Heart failure -- Heart failure with reduced ejection fraction; Heart failure -- Periodicals; 616.129005
• DOI: 10.1002/ehf2.13749
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2055-5822

Abstract

Abstract: Aims: The N‐terminal pro‐B‐type natriuretic peptide (NT‐proBNP) is a commonly used biomarker in heart failure for diagnosis and prognostication. We aimed to determine the prevalence of NT‐proBNP testing, distribution of NT‐proBNP concentrations, and factors associated with receiving an NT‐proBNP test in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), including the subset with a worsening heart failure event (WHFE). Methods and results: This was a retrospective cohort study using two US databases: (i) the de‐identified Humana Research Database between January 2015 and December 2018 and (ii) the Veradigm PINNACLE Registry ® between July 2013 and September 2017. We included adult patients with a confirmed diagnosis of HFrEF. In each data source, a subgroup of patients with a WHFE was identified, where a WHFE was defined as a heart failure‐related hospitalization or receipt of intravenous diuretics. Bivariate and multivariate analyses were conducted to assess factors associated with receiving NT‐proBNP testing. In Cohort 1 ( n = 249 238), 9.2% of patients with HFrEF and 10.8% of patients with a WHFE received NT‐proBNP testing. When restricted to patients with at least one laboratory claim, 11.3% of patients with HFrEF and 13.2% of those with a WHFE received NT‐proBNP testing. In Cohort 2 ( n = 91 444), 2.3% of patients with HFrEF were tested. Median (inter‐quartile range) NT‐proBNP concentrations among patients with HFrEF were 1399 (423–4087) pg/mL in Cohort 1 and 394 (142–688) pg/mL in Cohort 2. Median (inter‐quartile range) NT‐proBNP concentrations in the subset of patients with a WHFE in each cohort were 2209 (740–5894) and 464 (174–783) pg/mL, respectively. In Cohort 1, 13.4% of all HFrEF patients receiving NT‐proBNP testing and 18.9% of patients with a WHFE had NT‐proBNP values >8000 pg/mL; in Cohort 2, these percentages were 1.0% and 2.5%, respectively. Conclusions: In US clinical practice, NT‐proBNP testing was not frequently performed in patients with HFrEF. NT‐proBNP concentrations varied across data sources and subpopulations within HFrEF.