Visual obstruction, but not moderate traffic noise, increases reliance on heterospecific alarm calls. (30th June 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Ratnayake, Chaminda P; Zhou, You; Dawson Pell, Francesca S E; Potvin, Dominique A; Radford, Andrew N; Magrath, Robert D
• Editors: Ridley, Amanda
• Is Part Of: Behavioral ecology. Volume 32:Number 5(2021)
• Page Start: 941
• Page End: 951
• Publication Date: 2021-06-30
• Subjects: alarm calls -- anti-predator vigilance -- anthropogenic noise -- cross-modal interaction -- eavesdropping -- information constraint -- visual barrier; Animal behavior -- Periodicals; Behavior evolution -- Periodicals; Ecology -- Periodicals; Psychology, Comparative -- Periodicals; 591.5
• DOI: 10.1093/beheco/arab051
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1045-2249

Abstract

Abstract: Animals rely on both personal and social information about danger to minimize risk, yet environmental conditions constrain information. Both visual obstructions and background noise can reduce detectability of predators, which may increase reliance on social information, such as from alarm calls. Furthermore, a combination of visual and auditory constraints might greatly increase reliance on social information, because the loss of information from one source cannot be compensated by the other. Testing these possibilities requires manipulating personal information while broadcasting alarm calls. We therefore experimentally tested the effects of a visual barrier, traffic noise, and their combination on the response of Australian magpies, Cracticus tibicen, to heterospecific alarm calls. The barrier blocked only visual cues, while playback of moderate traffic noise could mask subtle acoustic cues of danger, such as of a predator's movement, but not the alarm-call playback. We predicted that response to alarm calls would increase with either visual or acoustic constraint, and that there would be a disproportionate response when both were present. As predicted, individuals responded more strongly to alarm calls when there was a visual barrier. However, moderate traffic noise did not affect responses, and the effect of the visual barrier was not greater during traffic-noise playback. We conclude that a reduction of personal, visual information led to a greater reliance on social information from alarm calls, confirming indirect evidence from other species. The absence of a traffic-noise effect could be because in Australian magpies hearing subtle cues is less important than vision in detecting predators. Abstract : Animals may detect predators themselves or respond to alarm calls from others. We tested whether restrictions on personal detection of predators by sight or sound increased responsiveness of Australian magpies to alarms from noisy miners. A visual barrier prompted stronger responses to alarms, but moderate traffic noise did not. Magpies therefore rely more on alarms from others when they have a poor view, but moderate traffic noise appeared not to affect their judgment of danger.