Evaluating herbicide programs for peanut response and weed control. Issue 2 (23rd September 2022)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Evaluating herbicide programs for peanut response and weed control. Issue 2 (23rd September 2022)
- Main Title:
- Evaluating herbicide programs for peanut response and weed control
- Authors:
- Kharel, Prasanna
Devkota, Pratap
MacDonald, Gregory
Tillman, Barry - Abstract:
- Abstract: Field research evaluated peanut ( Arachis hypogaea L.) tolerance and weed control with preemergence (PRE) followed by early postemergence (EPOST) herbicide programs: PRE pyroxasulfone, S ‐metolachlor, flumioxazin, pendimethalin, ethalfluralin, diclosulam, or dimethenamid‐P, followed by EPOST application of paraquat + acetochlor + bentazon at 4 wk after PRE (WA‐PRE). The herbicides resulted in no differences in peanut injury at 2 WA‐PRE in 2019 but flumioxazin resulted in approximately two‐fold greater injury (>22%) than other treatments in 2020 because of heavy rainfall at peanut cracking. Palmer amaranth ( Amaranthus palmeri S.Watson) control with diclosulam was lower than with other herbicides. Carpetweed ( Mollugo verticillata L.) control with S ‐metolachlor and dimethenamid‐P was at least 10% lower than with pendimethalin, flumioxazin, or pyroxasulfone at 4 WA‐PRE. Palmer amaranth control 2 wk after the EPOST (WA‐EPOST) application was >94% for all treatments except diclosulam. Peanut injury at 2 WA‐EPOST was ≤28% but was minimal by 8 WA‐EPOST. Overall, yield with herbicide treatments was similar to the weedfree control. A greenhouse experiment evaluated postemergence herbicide combinations for Palmer amaranth control, including 2, 4‐DB, acifluorfen, imazapic, bentazon + acifluorfen, pyroxasulfone + carfentrazone, and various combinations of each. Palmer amaranth control (≥99%) was greater and biomass (≤0.3 g plant –1 ) was lower with acifluorfen treatmentsAbstract: Field research evaluated peanut ( Arachis hypogaea L.) tolerance and weed control with preemergence (PRE) followed by early postemergence (EPOST) herbicide programs: PRE pyroxasulfone, S ‐metolachlor, flumioxazin, pendimethalin, ethalfluralin, diclosulam, or dimethenamid‐P, followed by EPOST application of paraquat + acetochlor + bentazon at 4 wk after PRE (WA‐PRE). The herbicides resulted in no differences in peanut injury at 2 WA‐PRE in 2019 but flumioxazin resulted in approximately two‐fold greater injury (>22%) than other treatments in 2020 because of heavy rainfall at peanut cracking. Palmer amaranth ( Amaranthus palmeri S.Watson) control with diclosulam was lower than with other herbicides. Carpetweed ( Mollugo verticillata L.) control with S ‐metolachlor and dimethenamid‐P was at least 10% lower than with pendimethalin, flumioxazin, or pyroxasulfone at 4 WA‐PRE. Palmer amaranth control 2 wk after the EPOST (WA‐EPOST) application was >94% for all treatments except diclosulam. Peanut injury at 2 WA‐EPOST was ≤28% but was minimal by 8 WA‐EPOST. Overall, yield with herbicide treatments was similar to the weedfree control. A greenhouse experiment evaluated postemergence herbicide combinations for Palmer amaranth control, including 2, 4‐DB, acifluorfen, imazapic, bentazon + acifluorfen, pyroxasulfone + carfentrazone, and various combinations of each. Palmer amaranth control (≥99%) was greater and biomass (≤0.3 g plant –1 ) was lower with acifluorfen treatments than with other treatments. The 2, 4‐DB + pyroxasulfone + carfentrazone treatment provided similar control to acifluorfen treatments. The EPOST paraquat + acetochlor + bentazon combinations following an effective PRE program will effectively control Palmer amaranth in peanut. Additionally, greenhouse experiments supported the use of acifluorfen for postemergence Palmer amaranth control. Core Ideas: Flumioxazin resulted in higher peanut injury when heavy rainfall occurred at the cracking stage. ALS herbicide did not effectively control Palmer amaranth, but PPO herbicides did. Initial peanut injury from PRE and EPOST herbicide was transient and did not decrease yield. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Crop, forage & turfgrass management. Volume 8:Issue 2(2022)
- Journal:
- Crop, forage & turfgrass management
- Issue:
- Volume 8:Issue 2(2022)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 8, Issue 2 (2022)
- Year:
- 2022
- Volume:
- 8
- Issue:
- 2
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2022-0008-0002-0000
- Page Start:
- n/a
- Page End:
- n/a
- Publication Date:
- 2022-09-23
- Subjects:
- Crop science -- Periodicals
Agronomy -- Periodicals
Forage -- Periodicals
Turf management -- Periodicals
Agronomy
Crop science
Forage
Turf management
Periodicals
Electronic journals
633 - Journal URLs:
- https://dl.sciencesocieties.org/publications/cftm ↗
https://acsess.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/23743832 ↗
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/ ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1002/cft2.20191 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 2374-3832
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 25784.xml