Functional Outcomes Following Microfragmented Adipose Tissue Versus Bone Marrow Aspirate Concentrate Injections for Symptomatic Knee Osteoarthritis. (21st July 2019)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Functional Outcomes Following Microfragmented Adipose Tissue Versus Bone Marrow Aspirate Concentrate Injections for Symptomatic Knee Osteoarthritis. (21st July 2019)
- Main Title:
- Functional Outcomes Following Microfragmented Adipose Tissue Versus Bone Marrow Aspirate Concentrate Injections for Symptomatic Knee Osteoarthritis
- Authors:
- Mautner, Kenneth
Bowers, Robert
Easley, Kirk
Fausel, Zachary
Robinson, Ryan - Abstract:
- Abstract: This study aimed to determine whether autologous orthobiologic tissue source affects pain and functional outcomes in patients with symptomatic knee osteoarthritis (OA) who received microfragmented adipose tissue (MFAT) or bone marrow aspirate concentrate (BMAC) injection. We retrospectively reviewed prospectively collected data from patients who received BMAC or MFAT injection for symptomatic knee OA. Patients completed baseline and follow-up surveys. Each survey included the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) questionnaire, Emory Quality of Life (EQOL) questionnaire, and Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for pain. The follow-up responses were compared with baseline for all patients and between BMAC and MFAT groups. A total of 110 patients met inclusion criteria, with 76 patients (BMAC 41, MFAT 35) and 106 knees (BMAC 58, MFAT 48) having appropriate follow-up data. The BMAC group included 17 females and 24 males, with a mean age of 59 ± 11 years. The MFAT group included 23 females and 12 males, with a mean age of 63 ± 11 years. Minimum follow-up time was 0.5 years. Mean follow-up time was 1.80 ± 0.88 years for BMAC and 1.09 ± 0.49 years for MFAT. Both groups had significant improvement in EQOL, VAS, and all KOOS parameters preprocedure versus postprocedure ( p < .001). There was not a significant difference when comparing postprocedure scores between groups ( p = .09, .38, .63, .94, .17, .15, .70, respectively). These data demonstrate significantAbstract: This study aimed to determine whether autologous orthobiologic tissue source affects pain and functional outcomes in patients with symptomatic knee osteoarthritis (OA) who received microfragmented adipose tissue (MFAT) or bone marrow aspirate concentrate (BMAC) injection. We retrospectively reviewed prospectively collected data from patients who received BMAC or MFAT injection for symptomatic knee OA. Patients completed baseline and follow-up surveys. Each survey included the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) questionnaire, Emory Quality of Life (EQOL) questionnaire, and Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for pain. The follow-up responses were compared with baseline for all patients and between BMAC and MFAT groups. A total of 110 patients met inclusion criteria, with 76 patients (BMAC 41, MFAT 35) and 106 knees (BMAC 58, MFAT 48) having appropriate follow-up data. The BMAC group included 17 females and 24 males, with a mean age of 59 ± 11 years. The MFAT group included 23 females and 12 males, with a mean age of 63 ± 11 years. Minimum follow-up time was 0.5 years. Mean follow-up time was 1.80 ± 0.88 years for BMAC and 1.09 ± 0.49 years for MFAT. Both groups had significant improvement in EQOL, VAS, and all KOOS parameters preprocedure versus postprocedure ( p < .001). There was not a significant difference when comparing postprocedure scores between groups ( p = .09, .38, .63, .94, .17, .15, .70, respectively). These data demonstrate significant improvement in pain and function with both MFAT and BMAC injections in patients with symptomatic knee OA without a significant difference in improvement when comparing the two autologous tissue sources. Stem Cells Translational Medicine 2019;8:1149–1156 : Abstract : Patients with symptomatic knee osteoarthritis received injections of either bone marrow aspirate concentrate (BMAC) or microfragmented adipose tissue (MFAT). Pain and function improved significantly in both groups without a significant difference in outcomes between the two treatments. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Stem cells translational medicine. Volume 8:Number 11(2019)
- Journal:
- Stem cells translational medicine
- Issue:
- Volume 8:Number 11(2019)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 8, Issue 11 (2019)
- Year:
- 2019
- Volume:
- 8
- Issue:
- 11
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2019-0008-0011-0000
- Page Start:
- 1149
- Page End:
- 1156
- Publication Date:
- 2019-07-21
- Subjects:
- Adipose stem cells -- Adipose -- Adult stem cells -- Bone marrow -- Mesenchymal stem cells -- Stem cells -- Arthritis
Stem cells -- Periodicals
Regenerative medicine -- Periodicals
Periodicals
616.0277405 - Journal URLs:
- https://academic.oup.com/stcltm ↗
http://stemcellsjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/hub/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)2157-6580/issues/ ↗
http://stemcellstm.alphamedpress.org/ ↗
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/ ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1002/sctm.18-0285 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 2157-6564
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 25787.xml