Development and Validation of a Fall Prevention Efficiency Scale. Issue 2 (25th March 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Dykes, Patricia C.; Khasnabish, Srijesa; Burns, Zoe; Adkison, Lesley E.; Alfieri, Lois; Bogaisky, Michael; Carroll, Diane L.; Carter, Eileen J.; Hurley, Ann C.; Jackson, Emily; Kurian, Susan; Lindros, Mary Ellen; Ryan, Virginia; Scanlan, Maureen; Sessler, Kelly; Shelley, Alexandra; Spivack, Linda B.; Walsh, Mary-Ann; Bates, David W.; Adelman, Jason S.
• Is Part Of: Journal of patient safety. Volume 18:Issue 2(2022)
• Page Start: 94
• Page End: 101
• Publication Date: 2022-03-25
• Subjects: fall prevention -- scale -- nursing workflow -- quality improvement -- patient safety; Patients -- Safety measures -- Periodicals; Medicine -- Practice -- Safety measures -- Periodicals; Medical errors -- Prevention -- Periodicals; 610.289
• DOI: 10.1097/PTS.0000000000000811
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1549-8417

Abstract

Abstract : Objectives: Fall TIPS (Tailoring Interventions for Patient Safety) is an evidence-based fall prevention program that led to a 25% reduction in falls in hospitalized adults. Because it would be helpful to assess nurses' perceptions of burdens imposed on them by using Fall TIPS or other fall prevention program, we conducted a study to learn benefits and burdens. Methods: A 3-phase mixed-method study was conducted at 3 hospitals in Massachusetts and 3 in New York: (1) initial qualitative, elicited and categorized nurses' views of time spent implementing Fall TIPS; (2) second qualitative, used nurses' quotes to develop items, research team inputs for refinement and organization, and clinical nurses' evaluation and suggestions to develop the prototype scale; and (3) quantitative, evaluated psychometric properties. Results: Four "time" themes emerged: (1) efficiency, (2) inefficiency, (3) balances out, and (4) valued. A 20-item prototype Fall Prevention Efficiency Scale was developed, administered to 383 clinical nurses, and reduced to 13 items. Individual items demonstrated robust stability with Pearson correlations of 0.349 to 0.550 and paired t tests of 0.155 to 1.636. Four factors explained 74.3% variance and provided empirical support for the scale's conceptual basis. The scale achieved excellent internal consistency values (0.82–0.92) when examined with the test, validation, and paired (both test and retest) samples Conclusions: This new scale assess nurses' perceptions of how a fall prevention program affects their efficiency, which impacts the likelihood of use. Learning nurses' beliefs about time wasted when implementing new programs allows hospitals to correct problems that squander time.