Practical implementation of remote continuous glucose monitoring in hospitalized patients with diabetes. (27th November 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Baker, Matt; Musselman, Megan E; Rogers, Rachel; Hellman, Richard
• Is Part Of: American journal of health-system pharmacy. Volume 79:Number 6(2022)
• Page Start: 452
• Page End: 458
• Publication Date: 2021-11-27
• Subjects: blood glucose monitoring -- continuous glucose monitoring -- diabetes -- hyperglycemia -- hypoglycemia -- inpatients; Hospital pharmacies -- United States -- Periodicals; 615.1
• DOI: 10.1093/ajhp/zxab456
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1079-2082

Abstract

Abstract: Purpose: Inpatient diabetes management involves frequent assessment of glucose levels for treatment decisions. Here we describe a program for inpatient real-time continuous glucose monitoring (rtCGM) at a community hospital and the accuracy of rtCGM-based glucose estimates. Methods: Adult inpatients with preexisting diabetes managed with intensive insulin therapy and a diagnosis of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) were monitored via rtCGM for safety. An rtCGM system transmitted glucose concentration and trending information at 5-minute intervals to nearby smartphones, which relayed the data to a centralized monitoring station. Hypoglycemia alerts were triggered by rtCGM values of ≤85 mg/dL, but rtCGM data were otherwise not used in management decisions; insulin dosing adjustments were based on blood glucose values measured via fingerstick blood sampling. Accuracy was evaluated retrospectively by comparing rtCGM values to contemporaneous point-of-care (POC) blood glucose values. Results: A total of 238 pairs of rtCGM and POC data points from 10 patients showed an overall mean absolute relative difference (MARD) of 10.3%. Clarke error grid analysis showed 99.2% of points in the clinically acceptable range, and surveillance error grid analysis showed 89.1% of points in the lowest risk category. It was determined that for 25% of the rtCGM values, discordances in rtCGM and POC values would likely have resulted in different insulin doses. Insulin dose recommendations based on rtCGM values differed by 1 to 3 units from POC-based recommendations. Conclusion: rtCGM for inpatient diabetes monitoring is feasible. Evaluation of individual rtCGM-POC paired values suggested that using rtCGM data for management decisions poses minimal risks to patients. Further studies to establish the safety and cost implications of using rtCGM data for inpatient diabetes management decisions are warranted.