On the use of the reproduction number for SARS‐CoV‐2: Estimation, misinterpretations and relationships with other ecological measures. (21st June 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Jewell, Nicholas P.; Lewnard, Joseph A.
• Is Part Of: Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Volume 185(2022)Supplement 1
• Page Start: S16
• Page End: S27
• Publication Date: 2022-06-21
• Subjects: causation -- Covid‐19 -- epidemics -- infectious disease -- reproductive numbers -- SARS‐CoV‐2; Social sciences -- Statistical methods -- Periodicals; Statistics -- Periodicals; 300.15195
• DOI: 10.1111/rssa.12860
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0964-1998

Abstract

Abstract: The basic reproduction number, R 0, and its real‐time analogue, Rt, are summary measures that reflect the ability of an infectious disease to spread through a population. Estimation methods for Rt have a long history, have been widely developed and are now enhanced by application to the COVID‐19 pandemic. While retrospective analyses of Rt have provided insight into epidemic dynamics and the effects of control strategies in prior outbreaks, misconceptions around the interpretation of Rt have arisen with broader recognition and near real‐time monitoring of this parameter alongside reported case data during the COVID‐19 pandemic. Here, we discuss some widespread misunderstandings regarding the use of Rt as a barometer for population risk and its related use as an 'on/off' switch for policy decisions regarding relaxation of non‐pharmaceutical interventions. Computation of Rt from downstream data (e.g. hospitalizations) when infection counts are unreliable exacerbates lags between when transmission happens and when events are recorded. We also discuss analyses that have shown various relationships between Rt and measures of mobility, vaccination coverage and a test–trace–isolation intervention in different settings.