Coral bleaching resistance variation is linked to differential mortality and skeletal growth during recovery. (7th November 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Walker, Nia S.; Nestor, Victor; Golbuu, Yimnang; Palumbi, Stephen R.
• Other Names: De Wit Pierre guestEditor.; Faust Ellika guestEditor.; Green Leon guestEditor.; Jahnke Marlene guestEditor.; Pereyra Ricardo T. guestEditor.; Rafajlović Marina guestEditor.
• Is Part Of: Evolutionary applications. Volume 16:Number 2(2023)
• Page Start: 504
• Page End: 517
• Publication Date: 2022-11-07
• Subjects: Acropora hyacinthus -- heat stress resistance and recovery -- intraspecific variation -- thermal resilience -- tradeoffs; Evolution (Biology) -- Periodicals; Genetics -- Periodicals; Natural selection -- Periodicals; Ecology -- Periodicals; 576.8
• DOI: 10.1111/eva.13500
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1752-4571

Abstract

Abstract: The prevalence of global coral bleaching has focused much attention on the possibility of interventions to increase heat resistance. However, if high heat resistance is linked to fitness tradeoffs that may disadvantage corals in other areas, then a more holistic view of heat resilience may be beneficial. In particular, overall resilience of a species to heat stress is likely to be the product of both resistance to heat and recovery from heat stress. Here, we investigate heat resistance and recovery among individual Acropora hyacinthus colonies in Palau. We divided corals into low, moderate, and high heat resistance categories based on the number of days (4–9) needed to reach significant pigmentation loss due to experimental heat stress. Afterward, we deployed corals back onto a reef in a common garden 6‐month recovery experiment that monitored chlorophyll a, mortality, and skeletal growth. Heat resistance was negatively correlated with mortality during early recovery (0–1 month) but not late recovery (4–6 months), and chlorophyll a concentration recovered in heat‐stressed corals by 1‐month postbleaching. However, moderate‐resistance corals had significantly greater skeletal growth than high‐resistance corals by 4 months of recovery. High‐ and low‐resistance corals on average did not exhibit skeletal growth within the observed recovery period. These data suggest complex tradeoffs may exist between coral heat resistance and recovery and highlight the importance of incorporating multiple aspects of resilience into future reef management programs.