Surgical intervention after medical treatment for early pregnancy loss according to gestational size. Issue 3 (16th August 2022)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Surgical intervention after medical treatment for early pregnancy loss according to gestational size. Issue 3 (16th August 2022)
- Main Title:
- Surgical intervention after medical treatment for early pregnancy loss according to gestational size
- Authors:
- Gluck, Ohad
Barber, Elad
Tal, Ori
Kerner, Ram
Weiner, Eran
Sagiv, Ron - Abstract:
- Abstract: Objective: To study the rate of surgical intervention for unsuccessful medical treatment in early pregnancy loss (EPL), according to gestational size by ultrasound (GS‐US). Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study. All women who were treated with misoprostol for EPL between July 2015 and December 2020 were included. The cohort was divided according to GS‐US: group 1: gestational sac without an embryonic pole; group 2: an embryonic pole with crown‐rump length (CRL) compatible with <7 weeks; group 3: CRL compatible with 7 +0 –7 +6 weeks; group 4: CRL compatible with 8 +0 –8 +6 weeks; group 5: CRL compatible with ≥9 weeks. We compared the rate of any surgical intervention due to treatment failure. Results: Overall, 783 patients were included: group 1, 236 (30.1%); group 2, 319 (40.7%); group 3, 115 (14.7%); group 4, 78 (10.0%); and group 5, 35 (5.0%) patients. The rate of any surgical intervention was significantly lower in groups 1–4 (54, 22.9%; 85, 26.6%; 28, 24.3%; and 22, 28.2%, respectively) compared with group 5 (17, 48.6%; P = 0.030). On multivariant analysis, GS‐US greater than 9 weeks was independently associated with the need for surgical intervention (adjusted odds ratio 1.23, 95% confidence interval 1.01–1.51; P = 0.040). Conclusion: When treating EPL medically, GS‐US greater than 9 weeks increases the risk of undergoing additional surgical intervention compared with younger weeks. Synopsis: When treating missed abortions medically, gestationalAbstract: Objective: To study the rate of surgical intervention for unsuccessful medical treatment in early pregnancy loss (EPL), according to gestational size by ultrasound (GS‐US). Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study. All women who were treated with misoprostol for EPL between July 2015 and December 2020 were included. The cohort was divided according to GS‐US: group 1: gestational sac without an embryonic pole; group 2: an embryonic pole with crown‐rump length (CRL) compatible with <7 weeks; group 3: CRL compatible with 7 +0 –7 +6 weeks; group 4: CRL compatible with 8 +0 –8 +6 weeks; group 5: CRL compatible with ≥9 weeks. We compared the rate of any surgical intervention due to treatment failure. Results: Overall, 783 patients were included: group 1, 236 (30.1%); group 2, 319 (40.7%); group 3, 115 (14.7%); group 4, 78 (10.0%); and group 5, 35 (5.0%) patients. The rate of any surgical intervention was significantly lower in groups 1–4 (54, 22.9%; 85, 26.6%; 28, 24.3%; and 22, 28.2%, respectively) compared with group 5 (17, 48.6%; P = 0.030). On multivariant analysis, GS‐US greater than 9 weeks was independently associated with the need for surgical intervention (adjusted odds ratio 1.23, 95% confidence interval 1.01–1.51; P = 0.040). Conclusion: When treating EPL medically, GS‐US greater than 9 weeks increases the risk of undergoing additional surgical intervention compared with younger weeks. Synopsis: When treating missed abortions medically, gestational size of 9 weeks or more increases the risk of undergoing additional surgical intervention compared with younger weeks. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics. Volume 160:Issue 3(2023)
- Journal:
- International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics
- Issue:
- Volume 160:Issue 3(2023)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 160, Issue 3 (2023)
- Year:
- 2023
- Volume:
- 160
- Issue:
- 3
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2023-0160-0003-0000
- Page Start:
- 933
- Page End:
- 938
- Publication Date:
- 2022-08-16
- Subjects:
- early pregnancy loss -- gestational size -- misoprostol -- ultrasound
Gynecology -- Periodicals
Obstetrics -- Periodicals
Electronic journals
618 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.clinicalkey.com/dura/browse/journalIssue/00207292 ↗
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/00207292 ↗
https://obgyn.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/18793479 ↗
http://www.elsevier.com/journals ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1002/ijgo.14371 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0020-7292
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 4542.273000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 25763.xml