EMS Provider Preference Comparison Between the Pre-hospital ELVO Detection During Initial Care Transport (PREDICT) Scale and the Rapid Arterial Occlusion Evaluation (RACE) Scale: A Subanalysis of the PREDICT Study. (16th November 2020)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- EMS Provider Preference Comparison Between the Pre-hospital ELVO Detection During Initial Care Transport (PREDICT) Scale and the Rapid Arterial Occlusion Evaluation (RACE) Scale: A Subanalysis of the PREDICT Study. (16th November 2020)
- Main Title:
- EMS Provider Preference Comparison Between the Pre-hospital ELVO Detection During Initial Care Transport (PREDICT) Scale and the Rapid Arterial Occlusion Evaluation (RACE) Scale: A Subanalysis of the PREDICT Study
- Authors:
- Viacava, Enzo F
Cruz, Aurora S
Ugiliweneza, Beatrice
Dengzhi, Wang
White, Andrew
Khattar, Nicolas K
Gallimore, Bryan
Ding, Dale
Wolfe, Stacey Q
Heck, Donald
James, Robert F - Abstract:
- Abstract: INTRODUCTION: Pre-hospital identification of patients with large vessel occlusion (LVO) is critical in the timely triage of thrombectomy-eligible patients to comprehensive stroke centers. Emergency Medical Services (EMS) training is critical to the success of prehospital screening scales. METHODS: 86 EMS providers were trained on a secure, online application to perform and record the PREDICT-4 and RACE scales and complete a one-question survey on their preference. A chi-square and one-sample test of proportion was conducted. RESULTS: 86 EMS providers enrolled 250 subjects. 38 providers enrolled one subject and 48 enrolled ≥2. For all EMS providers with and without previous exposure to the RACE scale, 37.2% preferred the PREDICT 4-item scale and 62.8% preferred the RACE scale, P = . 018, 95%CI [27.7, 47.8 and 52.2, 72.2, respectively]. 49 providers (34.7%) without prior mere-exposure to the RACE scale preferred PREDICT-4 [95%CI 22.9, 48.6%] and 65.3% preferred RACE ( P = . 03, 95%CI [51.3, 77.0]). For providers who enrolled ≥2, on their first screening 41.6%, ( P = . 248, 95%CI [28.8, 55.7]) preferred PREDICT-4 and 58.3%, RACE. On their last screening, only 37.5%, ( P = . 08, 95%CI [25.2, 51.6]) preferred PREDICT-4. CONCLUSION: The PREDICT scale was found to be less preferable with EMS provider all-comers, which may be partially explained by mere-exposure cognitive bias, though this difference persisted in providers without prior exposure to either scale. InAbstract: INTRODUCTION: Pre-hospital identification of patients with large vessel occlusion (LVO) is critical in the timely triage of thrombectomy-eligible patients to comprehensive stroke centers. Emergency Medical Services (EMS) training is critical to the success of prehospital screening scales. METHODS: 86 EMS providers were trained on a secure, online application to perform and record the PREDICT-4 and RACE scales and complete a one-question survey on their preference. A chi-square and one-sample test of proportion was conducted. RESULTS: 86 EMS providers enrolled 250 subjects. 38 providers enrolled one subject and 48 enrolled ≥2. For all EMS providers with and without previous exposure to the RACE scale, 37.2% preferred the PREDICT 4-item scale and 62.8% preferred the RACE scale, P = . 018, 95%CI [27.7, 47.8 and 52.2, 72.2, respectively]. 49 providers (34.7%) without prior mere-exposure to the RACE scale preferred PREDICT-4 [95%CI 22.9, 48.6%] and 65.3% preferred RACE ( P = . 03, 95%CI [51.3, 77.0]). For providers who enrolled ≥2, on their first screening 41.6%, ( P = . 248, 95%CI [28.8, 55.7]) preferred PREDICT-4 and 58.3%, RACE. On their last screening, only 37.5%, ( P = . 08, 95%CI [25.2, 51.6]) preferred PREDICT-4. CONCLUSION: The PREDICT scale was found to be less preferable with EMS provider all-comers, which may be partially explained by mere-exposure cognitive bias, though this difference persisted in providers without prior exposure to either scale. In providers who enrolled multiple patients, there was a trend towards preference for RACE between their first and last screening. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Neurosurgery. Volume 67(2010)Supplement 1
- Journal:
- Neurosurgery
- Issue:
- Volume 67(2010)Supplement 1
- Issue Display:
- Volume 67, Issue 1 (2010)
- Year:
- 2010
- Volume:
- 67
- Issue:
- 1
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2010-0067-0001-0000
- Page Start:
- Page End:
- Publication Date:
- 2020-11-16
- Subjects:
- Nervous system -- Surgery -- Periodicals
617.48005 - Journal URLs:
- https://academic.oup.com/neurosurgery ↗
http://www.neurosurgery-online.com ↗
https://journals.lww.com/neurosurgery/pages/default.aspx ↗
http://journals.lww.com ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1093/neuros/nyaa447_356 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0148-396X
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 6081.582000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library STI - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 25759.xml