Quality of maternal and newborn care around the time of childbirth for migrant versus nonmigrant women during the COVID‐19 pandemic: Results of the IMAgiNE EURO study in 11 countries of the WHO European region. Issue 1 (18th December 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Costa, Raquel; Rodrigues, Carina; Dias, Heloísa; Covi, Benedetta; Mariani, Ilaria; Valente, Emanuelle Pessa; Zaigham, Mehreen; Vik, Eline Skirnisdottir; Grylka‐Baeschlin, Susanne; Arendt, Maryse; Santos, Teresa; Wandschneider, Lisa; Drglin, Zalka; Drandić, Daniela; Radetic, Jelena; Rozée, Virginie; Elden, Helen; Mueller, Antonia N.; Barata, Catarina; Miani, Céline; Bohinec, Anja; Ruzicic, Jovana; de La Rochebrochard, Elise; Linden, Karolina; Geremia, Sara; de Labrusse, Claire; Batram‐Zantvoort, Stephanie; Ponikvar, Barbara Mihevc; Sacks, Emma; Lazzerini, Marzia
• Other Names: Conway Francesca guestEditor.; Costa Raquel guestEditor.; Otelea Marina R. guestEditor.; Sacks Emma guestEditor.
• Is Part Of: International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics. Volume 159:Issue 1(2022)supplement 1
• Page Start: 39
• Page End: 53
• Publication Date: 2022-12-18
• Subjects: childbirth -- COVID‐19 -- IMAgiNE EURO study -- maternal health care -- migrant women -- migrant‐friendly health systems -- neonatal health care -- pregnancy; Gynecology -- Periodicals; Obstetrics -- Periodicals; Electronic journals; 618
• DOI: 10.1002/ijgo.14472
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0020-7292

Abstract

Abstract: Objective: To describe the perception of quality of maternal and newborn care (QMNC) around the time of childbirth among migrant and nonmigrant women in Europe. Methods: Women who gave birth at a health facility in 11 countries of the WHO European Region from March 2020 to July 2021 were invited to answer an online questionnaire including demographics and childbirth experience. Data were analyzed and compared for 1781 migrant and 20 653 nonmigrant women. Results: Migrant women who experienced labor perceived slightly more difficulties in attending routine antenatal visits (41.2% vs 39.4%; P = 0.001), more barriers in accessing facilities (32.9% vs 29.9%; P = 0.001), lack of timely care (14.7% vs 13.0%; P = 0.025), inadequate room comfort and equipment (9.2% vs 8.5%; P = 0.004), inadequate number of women per room (9.4% vs 8.6%; P = 0.039), being prevented from staying with their baby as they wished (7.8% vs 6.9%; P = 0.011), or suffering abuse (14.5% vs 12.7%; P = 0.022) compared with nonmigrant women. For women who had a prelabor cesarean, migrant women were more likely not to receive pain relief after birth (16.8% vs . 13.5%; P = 0.039) and less likely to provide informal payment (1.8% vs 4.4%; P = 0.005) compared with nonmigrant women. Overall, the QMNC index was not significantly different for migrant compared with nonmigrant women. Conclusion: Gaps in overall QMNC were reported by both migrant and nonmigrant women, with improvements to healthcare necessary for all. Synopsis: Both migrant and nonmigrant women reported gaps in overall quality of maternal and newborn health care, highlighting the need for overarching improvements.