Quality improvement tools to manage deceased organ donation processes: a scoping review. Issue 2 (2nd February 2023)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Silva, Amina; Arora, Samantha; Dhanani, Sonny; Rochon, Andrea; Giorno, Luciana P.; Jackson, Elayne; Hornby, Laura; Latifi, Marzieh; Lotherington, Ken; Luctkar-Flude, Marian; Petry, Stefany; Wilson, Lindsay; Silva e Silva, Vanessa
• Is Part Of: BMJ open. Volume 13:Issue 2(2023)
• Publication Date: 2023-02-02
• Subjects: TRANSPLANT MEDICINE -- Quality in health care -- Organisation of health services; Medicine -- Research -- Periodicals; 610.72
• DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-070333
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2044-6055

Abstract

Abstract : Objective: To collate and summarise the literature on the quality improvement tools that have been developed for deceased organ donation processes after circulatory determination of death and neurological determination of death. Design: Scoping review using the Joanna Briggs Institute framework. Data sources: We searched for published (MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, CINAHL, Web of Science) and unpublished literature (organ donation organisation websites worldwide). The search was initially conducted on 17 July 2021 and updated on 1 June 2022. Included articles discussed the creation and/or use of quality improvement tools to manage deceased organ donation processes. Two independent reviewers screened the references, extracted and analysed the data. Results: 40 references were included in this review, and most records were written in English (n=38), originated in Canada (n=21), published between 2016 and 2022 (n=22), and were specific for donation after neurological determination of death (n=20). The tools identified included checklists, algorithms, flow charts, charts, pathways, decision tree maps and mobile apps. These tools were applied in the following phases of the organ donation process: (1) potential donor identification, (2) donor referral, (3) donor assessment and risk, (4) donor management, (5) withdrawal of life-sustaining measures, (6) death determination, (7) organ retrieval and (8) overall organ donation process. Conclusions: We conducted a thorough investigation of the available quality improvement tools for deceased organ donation processes. The existing evidence lacks details in the report of methods used for development, testing and impact of these tools, and we could not locate tools specific for some phases of the organ donation process. Lastly, by mapping existing tools, we aim to facilitate both clinician choices among available tools, as well as research work building on existing knowledge.