(Anti)Barbarous Empires: J.M. Coetzee's Iconoclasm in Waiting for the Barbarians. (17th February 2023)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Biti, Vladimir
• Is Part Of: European review. Volume 31:Number 1(2023)
• Page Start: 9
• Page End: 16
• Publication Date: 2023-02-17
• Subjects: Learned institutions and societies -- Europe -- Periodicals; 940
• DOI: 10.1017/S1062798722000539
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1062-7987

Abstract

Abstract : Empires usually operate on the premise that only imperial centres are carriers of the historical progress of humanity, whereas imperial peripheries are far removed from this progress's blessing. According to John Maxwell Coetzee, the Dutch Empire considered South Africa as its own land, which deprived that country's indigenous people of their citizen rights. Like the residents of European imperial peripheries who were relegated to similar zones of historical indistinction, they were doomed to the twilight of legal illegality. Unlike the regulated area of historical progress, their state of exception was ruled by the whims of imperial officials. 'The security police could come in and out and blindfold and handcuff you without explaining why, and take you away to an unspecified site and do what they wanted to you', he wrote in Diary of a Bad Year (1977: 171). In his novel Waiting for the Barbarians, Coetzee strategically 'unmoors' and 'deterritorializes' this peripheral state of exception, spreading its iconoclastic effects all over the 'sacrosanct' territory of history.