Two bloom‐forming species of Ulva (Chlorophyta) show different responses to seawater temperature and no antagonistic interaction. Issue 1 (21st December 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Bermejo, Ricardo; Galindo‐Ponce, Maria; Golden, Nessa; Linderhoff, Charlene; Heesch, Svenja; Hernández, Ignacio; Morrison, Liam
• Is Part Of: Journal of phycology. Volume 59:Issue 1(2023)
• Page Start: 167
• Page End: 178
• Publication Date: 2022-12-21
• Subjects: climate change -- green tides -- photoperiod -- temperature -- Ulva compressa -- Ulva lacinulata; Algae -- Periodicals; 579.8
• DOI: 10.1111/jpy.13302
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0022-3646

Abstract

Abstract : The generalized use of molecular identification tools indicated that multispecific green tides are more common than previously thought . Temporal successions between bloom‐forming species on a seasonal basis were also revealed in different cold temperate estuaries, suggesting a key role of photoperiod and temperature controlling bloom development and composition. According to the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, water temperatures are predicted to increase around 4°C by 2100 in Ireland, especially during late spring coinciding with early green tide development. Considering current and predicted temperatures, and photoperiods during bloom development, different eco‐physiological experiments were developed. These experiments indicated that the growth of Ulva lacinulata was controlled by temperature, while U. compressa was unresponsive to the photoperiod and temperatures assayed. Considering a scenario of global warming for Irish waters, an earlier development of bloom is expected in the case of U. lacinulata . This could have significant consequences for biomass balance in Irish estuaries and the maximum accumulated biomass during peak bloom. The observed seasonal patterns and experiments also indicated that U. compressa may facilitate U. lacinulata development. When both species were co‐cultivated, the culture performance showed intermediate responses to experimental treatments in comparison with monospecific cultures of both species.