Restrictive and liberal transfusion strategies in extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: A retrospective observational study. Issue 2 (13th December 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Ng, Pauline Yeung; Chan, Ho Ching Victor; Ip, April; Ling, Lowell; Chan, Kai Man; Leung, Kit Hung Anne; Chan, King Chung Kenny; So, Dominic; Shum, Hoi Ping; Ngai, Chun Wai; Chan, Wai Ming; Sin, Wai Ching
• Is Part Of: Transfusion. Volume 63:Issue 2(2023)
• Page Start: 294
• Page End: 304
• Publication Date: 2022-12-13
• Subjects: ECMO -- hemoglobin -- intensive care unit -- red blood cell transfusion; Hematology -- Periodicals; Blood -- Transfusion -- Periodicals; Blood Group Antigens -- Periodicals; Blood Preservation -- Periodicals; Blood Transfusion -- Periodicals; 615
• DOI: 10.1111/trf.17221
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0041-1132

Abstract

Abstract: Background: To compare the outcomes of patients requiring extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) support who had a restrictive transfusion strategy with those who had a liberal strategy. Study Design and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed all adult patients from 2010 to 2019 who received a minimum of one packed red blood cell (pRBC) during ECMO. Hemoglobin values before each transfusion were retrieved. Restrictive transfusion strategy was defined as a transfusion threshold ≤8.5 g/dl in all transfusion episodes for a single patient, while liberal transfusion strategy was defined as a transfusion threshold >8.5 g/dl in any transfusion episode. Results: The analysis included 763 patients, with 138 (18.1%) patients in the restrictive and 625 (81.9%) in the liberal transfusion strategy group. The median hemoglobin level, taking into account all measured hemoglobin values, during ECMO support was 8.3 and 9.9 g/dl, and the average units of pRBC received per day were 0.7 (0.3–1.8) and 1.2 (0.6–2.3), respectively. There were no significant differences in intensive care unit (ICU) mortality (adjusted odds ratio (OR), 0.86; 95% CI 0.56–1.30; p = .47), hospital mortality (adjusted OR, 0.79; 95% CI 0.52–1.21; p = .28), and 90‐day mortality (adjusted OR, 0.84; 95% CI 0.55–1.28; p = .42) between the two groups. Among subgroup analyses, a restrictive transfusion strategy was associated with decreased risk of ICU mortality in patients on veno‐venous ECMO (adjusted OR, 0.36; 95% CI 0.17–0.73; p = .005). There was no heterogeneity on outcomes across patients stratified by age, APACHE IV score, or need for large volume transfusion. Discussion: Our data suggested it may be safe to adopt a restrictive red cell transfusion threshold of 8.5 g/dl in patients on ECMO, and highlighted the need for prospective trials in this heavily‐transfused population.