Efficacy of initial methotrexate monotherapy versus combination therapy with a biological agent in early rheumatoid arthritis: a meta-analysis of clinical and radiographic remission. Issue 7 (26th April 2010)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Efficacy of initial methotrexate monotherapy versus combination therapy with a biological agent in early rheumatoid arthritis: a meta-analysis of clinical and radiographic remission. Issue 7 (26th April 2010)
- Main Title:
- Efficacy of initial methotrexate monotherapy versus combination therapy with a biological agent in early rheumatoid arthritis: a meta-analysis of clinical and radiographic remission
- Authors:
- Kuriya, B
Arkema, E V
Bykerk, V P
Keystone, E C - Abstract:
- Abstract : Objective: The target outcome in early rheumatoid arthritis (ERA) is now remission. This meta-analysis compared the efficacy of initial methotrexate monotherapy versus combination therapy (methotrexate plus biological agent) for clinical remission and radiographic non-progression among ERA patients with minimal or no previous methotrexate exposure. Methods: A systematic search was performed for randomised controlled trials of ERA using predefined criteria. A random effects model was used to pool the risk ratio (RR) for clinical and radiographic remission at 52–56 weeks of follow-up. Results: Seven trials of combination therapy with infliximab, adalimumab, etanercept or abatacept were included. The majority of studies defined clinical remission as a 28-joint disease activity score (DAS28) of 2.6 or less. Radiographic non-progression was primarily defined as a modified total Sharp score change of less than 0.5 units. All trials demonstrated risk estimates in favour of combination therapy: the pooled RR for achieving clinical remission was 1.74 (95% CI 1.54 to 1.98) and for radiographic non-progression was 1.30 (95% CI 1.01 to 1.68). Significant heterogeneity among studies for the latter outcome was detected (p<0.001). Conclusions: The efficacy of combination therapy with a biological agent is superior to methotrexate monotherapy for remission. Combination therapy has a greater initial effect on clinical remission than radiographic non-progression. UniformAbstract : Objective: The target outcome in early rheumatoid arthritis (ERA) is now remission. This meta-analysis compared the efficacy of initial methotrexate monotherapy versus combination therapy (methotrexate plus biological agent) for clinical remission and radiographic non-progression among ERA patients with minimal or no previous methotrexate exposure. Methods: A systematic search was performed for randomised controlled trials of ERA using predefined criteria. A random effects model was used to pool the risk ratio (RR) for clinical and radiographic remission at 52–56 weeks of follow-up. Results: Seven trials of combination therapy with infliximab, adalimumab, etanercept or abatacept were included. The majority of studies defined clinical remission as a 28-joint disease activity score (DAS28) of 2.6 or less. Radiographic non-progression was primarily defined as a modified total Sharp score change of less than 0.5 units. All trials demonstrated risk estimates in favour of combination therapy: the pooled RR for achieving clinical remission was 1.74 (95% CI 1.54 to 1.98) and for radiographic non-progression was 1.30 (95% CI 1.01 to 1.68). Significant heterogeneity among studies for the latter outcome was detected (p<0.001). Conclusions: The efficacy of combination therapy with a biological agent is superior to methotrexate monotherapy for remission. Combination therapy has a greater initial effect on clinical remission than radiographic non-progression. Uniform definitions of remission are needed and the proportion of subjects who achieve the combined endpoint of clinical and radiographic remission should be considered as a meaningful outcome in future studies of ERA. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Annals of the rheumatic diseases. Volume 69:Issue 7(2010)
- Journal:
- Annals of the rheumatic diseases
- Issue:
- Volume 69:Issue 7(2010)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 69, Issue 7 (2010)
- Year:
- 2010
- Volume:
- 69
- Issue:
- 7
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2010-0069-0007-0000
- Page Start:
- 1298
- Page End:
- 1304
- Publication Date:
- 2010-04-26
- Subjects:
- Rheumatism -- Periodicals
616.723005 - Journal URLs:
- http://ard.bmjjournals.com/ ↗
http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/tocrender.fcgi?journal=149&action=archive ↗
http://www.bmj.com/archive ↗
http://gateway.ovid.com/server3/ovidweb.cgi?T=JS&MODE=ovid&D=ovft&PAGE=titles&SEARCH=annals+of+the+rheumatic+diseases.tj&NEWS=N ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1136/ard.2009.118307 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0003-4967
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 25686.xml