Emergent and planned interpersonal synchronization are both sensitive to 'tempo aftereffect contagion'. (12th March 2023)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Uccelli, Stefano; Sacheli, Lucia Maria; Paulesu, Eraldo
• Is Part Of: Neuropsychologia. Number 181(2023)
• Publication Date: 2023-03-12
• Subjects: Sensorimotor synchronization -- Finger tapping -- Entrainment -- Joint action -- Tempo aftereffect -- Motor coordination; SMS sensorimotor synchronization -- JA joint action -- IOI inter-onset-interval -- ITI inter-tap-interval -- CC cross-correlation -- SEM standard error of the mean -- CI confidence interval -- AQ autism-spectrum quotient questionnaire; Neuropsychology -- Periodicals; Neurology -- Periodicals; Psychophysiology -- Periodicals; Neuropsychologie -- Périodiques; Neuropsychology; Periodicals; Electronic journals; 616.8
• DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2023.108492
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0028-3932

Abstract

Abstract: Interpersonal synchronization is fundamental for motor coordination during social interactions. Discerning emergent (entrainment) from planned synchronization represents a non-trivial issue in visually bonded individuals acting together, as well as assessing whether inter-individual differences, e.g., in autistic traits, modulate both types of synchronization. In a visuomotor finger-tapping task, two participants replicated a target tempo either synchronizing ('joint' condition) or not ('non-interactive' condition, 'non-int') with each other. One participant was exposed ('induced') to tempo aftereffect (a medium tempo seems faster or slower after exposure to slower or faster inducing tempi), but not the other participant ('not induced'); thus they had different timing perceptions of the same target. We assessed to what degree emergent and/or planned synchronization affected dyads by analyzing inter-tap-intervals, synchronization indexes, and cross-correlation coefficients. Results revealed a 'tempo aftereffect contagion': inter-tap-intervals of both induced and not-induced participants showed aftereffect in both the joint and non-int conditions. Moreover, aftereffects did not correlate across conditions suggesting they might be due to (at least in part) different processes, but the propensity for tempo aftereffect contagion correlated with individuals' autistic traits only in the non-int condition. Finally, participants co-adjusted their tapping more in the joint condition than in the non-int one, as confirmed by higher synchronization indexes and the mutual adaptation pattern of cross-correlation coefficients. Altogether, these results show the subtle interplay between emergent and planned interpersonal synchronization mechanisms that act on a millisecond timescale independently from synching or not with the partner. Highlights: Visually-bonded dyads of participants tapped either synchronizing or not with each other. One participant was induced to a tempo aftereffect whereas the other was not. Dyads showed 'tempo aftereffect contagion' either when synchronizing or not. Sensitivity to 'tempo aftereffect contagion' correlated with individual autistic traits.