Validity of a novel device for indoor analysis of cyclists' drag area. Issue 1 (2nd January 2023)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Ordiñana-Pérez, M.; Mateo-March, M.; Monteagudo, P.; Zabala, M.; Blasco-Lafarga, C.
• Is Part Of: European journal of sport science. Volume 23:Issue 1(2023)
• Page Start: 1
• Page End: 7
• Publication Date: 2023-01-02
• Subjects: Coefficient of drag -- cycling -- mathematical models -- testing -- endurance -- pitot-tube; Sports sciences -- Periodicals; Sports Medicine -- Periodicals; Exercise -- Periodicals; Sports -- Periodicals; 612
• DOI: 10.1080/17461391.2021.2012264
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1746-1391

Abstract

Abstract: Purpose: Cyclists need to measure aerodynamic resistance accurately and reliably, as well as economically. Devices such as Notio Aerostick, an equipment device that includes one pitot tube, have appeared for this purpose. The aim of this study is, therefore, to test the reliability and degree of agreement in the evaluation of the CdA (coefficient of aerodynamic drag), assessed by means of the Notio Aerostick compared to the Virtual Elevation (VE) and Martin mathematical models. Method: Seventeen professional cyclists rode in a 250-metre-long velodrome covered with a concrete surface with their own time trial bikes. Each cyclist completed three rides of 15 laps at constant speed for the evaluation of the CdA, each of them in a different position [Baseline (B), Change 1 (C1) and Change 2 (C2)]. Results: The differences in CdA between methods were found for Martin in comparison with VE in all positions ( p <.001) and with Notio Aerostick in B and C2 ( p > .05). About differences of CdA for each method, considering between position changes, the results were the same for VE and Martin, but different for Notio Aerostick. Conclusions: Findings suggest that, notwithstanding Notio Aerostick is valid if we compare CdA values with respect to VE, since the direction of their between-positions CdA changes differs, the results of their aerodynamic evaluation could lead us to recommend different final setups. We need studies that evaluate different units of the Notio Aerostick device as well as the reliability and precision of each sensor that includes Notio Aerostick. Highlights: The CdA calculated by the Notio Aerostick and VE, a mathematical model previously validated, can be interchangeable, however the final position recommended by each method may be different, since the changes in the following position are given by the changes of the CdA in the previous position. None of the three methods allowed elite cyclists to measure statistically significant differences between the proposed setups. Although the CdA differences between positions were not significant, they can be decisive in the final result of a time trial competition.