One year comprehensive prospective follow-up of achalasia patients after peroral endoscopic myotomy. (1st January 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Evensen, Helge; Småstuen, Milada Cvancarova; Schulz, Anselm; Kristensen, Vendel; Larssen, Lene; Skattum, Jorunn; Sandstad, Olav; Hauge, Truls; Medhus, Asle W.
• Is Part Of: Annals of medicine. Volume 53:Number 1(2021)
• Page Start: 2227
• Page End: 2235
• Publication Date: 2021-01-01
• Subjects: Achalasia -- peroral endoscopic myotomy -- objective outcome evaluation -- predictive outcome factors -- gastroesophageal reflux disease; Medicine -- Periodicals; 610
• DOI: 10.1080/07853890.2021.2005253
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0785-3890

Abstract

Abstract: Background and aims: Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) is an established therapy for achalasia, but outcome evaluation has often been limited to Eckardt score (ES). The present study was aimed to improve knowledge about outcome evaluation and predictive outcome factors by performing a comprehensive objective evaluation of achalasia patients treated by POEM. Methods: This single centre prospective study reports outcome data 12 months after POEM in treatment-naive achalasia patients. A predefined follow-up protocol included ES, high resolution manometry, 24-h pH measurement, upper endoscopy and timed barium esophagogram (TBE). Univariate and multivariate regression analyses were performed to analyze association between post-POEM variables and identify predictive factors for objective outcome. Results: Fifty patients were included with a drop-out rate of <5%. ES, lower oesophageal sphincter pressures, TBE heights and maximal oesophageal diameter were all reduced after POEM ( p < .001), and 28% (13/47) of the patients had a positive 24-h pH registration. An oesophageal diameter >3 cm after POEM was associated with treatment failure assessed by ES ( p = .04) and TBE ( p = .03). Advanced achalasia stage ( p = .02) and long symptom duration ( p = .04) were identified as independent predictive factors for poor outcome assessed by TBE. Conclusions: The present study confirms that POEM is an efficient therapy for achalasia. The comprehensive objective evaluation after POEM demonstrates that long symptom duration and major changes in oesophageal anatomy at diagnosis imply poor treatment outcome, and a post-POEM dilated oesophagus is associated with treatment failure. Key messages: Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) is established as a safe and effective therapy for achalasia. Timed barium esophagogram offers objective variables that are valuable in treatment response evaluation. Advanced achalasia stage and long symptom duration are predictive factors for poor objective treatment response after POEM.