Stakeholder preferences for attributes of digital health technologies to consider in health service funding. (14th February 2023)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: von Huben, Amy; Howell, Martin; Norris, Sarah; Wong, Kam Cheong; Tang, James; Kazi, Samia; Laranjo, Liliana; Chow, Clara K.; Howard, Kirsten
• Is Part Of: International journal of technology assessment in health care. Volume 39:Number 1(2023)
• Publication Date: 2023-02-14
• Subjects: digital health technology -- remote monitoring -- chronic disease self-management -- best-worst scaling -- health technology assessment; Medical technology -- Periodicals; Technology assessment -- Periodicals; 610.28
• DOI: 10.1017/S0266462323000089
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0266-4623

Abstract

Abstract: Objectives: Health service providers are currently making decisions on the public funding of digital health technologies (DHTs) for managing chronic diseases with limited understanding of stakeholder preferences for DHT attributes. This study aims to understand the community, patient/carer, and health professionals' preferences to help inform a prioritized list of evaluation criteria. Methods: An online best–worst scaling survey was conducted in Australia, New Zealand, Canada, and the United Kingdom to ascertain the relative importance of twenty-four DHT attributes among stakeholder groups using an efficient incomplete block design. The attributes were identified from a systematic review of DHT evaluation frameworks for consideration in a health technology assessment. Results were analyzed with multinomial models by stakeholder group and latent class. Results: A total of 1, 251 participants completed the survey (576 general community members, 543 patients/carers, and 132 health professionals). Twelve attributes achieved a preference score above 50 percent in the stakeholder group model, predominantly related to safety but also covering technical features, effectiveness, ethics, and economics. Results from the latent class model supported this prioritization. Overall, connectedness with the patient's healthcare team seemed the most important; with " Helps health professionals respond quickly when changes in patient care are needed " as the most highly prioritized of all attributes. Conclusions: It is proposed that these prioritized twelve attributes be considered in all evaluations of DHTs that manage chronic disease, supplemented with a limited number of attributes that reflect the specific perspective of funders, such as equity of access, cost, and system-level implementation considerations.