Forage based diet as an alternative to a high concentrate diet for finishing young bulls - Effects on growth performance, greenhouse gas emissions and meat quality. (April 2023)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Santos-Silva, José; Alves, Susana P.; Francisco, Alexandra; Portugal, Ana Paula; Dentinho, Maria Teresa; Almeida, João; da Silva, José Leandro Regedor; Fialho, Letícia; Cachucho, Liliana; Jerónimo, Eliana; Barradas, Ana; Rodrigues, António; Rodrigues, Nuno; Teixeira, Ricardo F.M.; Domingos, Tiago; Bessa, Rui J.B.
• Is Part Of: Meat science. Volume 198(2023)
• Publication Date: 2023-04
• Subjects: Beef -- Forage diets -- Growth performance -- Meat quality -- Fatty acids -- Carbon footprint; Meat -- Periodicals; Meat industry and trade -- Periodicals; Viande -- Périodiques; Viande -- Industrie -- Périodiques; Meat; Meat industry and trade; Periodicals; 641.36
• DOI: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2023.109098
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0309-1740

Abstract

Abstract: Two groups of 8 individually housed young crossbred-bulls, in the finishing period, were used to test the effect of a Total Mixed Ration diet with high forage content (54% DM), low starch content (14% DM), supplemented with sunflower seeds (10% DM) (HFS) on growth performance, carcass and meat quality, fatty acid profile and carbon footprint, with reference to a conventional concentrate-based (90% DM) (Control) diet. The experiment lasted 64 days before slaughter. During the experiment, feed intake was monitored daily and live weight every 14 days. Individual CH4 emissions were assessed at 16-days intervals, using a GreenFeed for Large Animal unit. Feed intake and feed conversion ratio were higher for HFS diet, but average daily weight gain and feeding costs were similar for the two diets. Dressing percentage was reduced with HFS diet. The HFS increased redness, yellowness and Chroma of subcutaneous fat, but did not compromise commercial value of the carcasses. Meat colour, shear force, or sensory parameters were not affected by diet. The HFS diet allowed a healthier FA profile, due to the higher proportions of 18:3n-3, t 11–18:1 and c 9, t 11–18:2 and the lower proportion of t 10–18:1. The HFS diet did not reduce the carbon footprint in the finishing period of young bulls, due to increased digestive CH4 emissions. The results of this experiment showed that the HFS diet can be an alternative to the conventional diets used in finishing young-bulls. Although it may result in a slight reduction in animal performance, it has a strong impact on reducing dependence on inputs from outside the farm.