Comparing symptom reporting by prostate cancer patients and healthcare professionals in the international multicentre REQUITE study. (January 2023)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Comparing symptom reporting by prostate cancer patients and healthcare professionals in the international multicentre REQUITE study. (January 2023)
- Main Title:
- Comparing symptom reporting by prostate cancer patients and healthcare professionals in the international multicentre REQUITE study
- Authors:
- Heumann, Philipp
Aguado-Barrera, Miguel E.
Avuzzi, Barbara
Azria, David
Briers, Erik
Bultijnck, Renée
Choudhury, Ananya
De Ruysscher, Dirk
Farcy-Jacquet, Marie-Pierre
Fonteyne, Valérie
Gómez Caamaño, Antonio
Helmbold, Irmgard
Johnson, Kerstie
Kerns, Sarah L.
Lambrecht, Maarten
Lingard, Zoe
Rancati, Tiziana
Rosenstein, Barry S.
Sperk, Elena
Paul Symonds, R.
Talbot, Christopher
Valdagni, Riccardo
Vega, Ana
Veldeman, Liv
Ward, Tim
Webb, Adam
West, Catharine M.
Chang-Claude, Jenny
Seibold, Petra - Abstract:
- Highlights: One of the largest prostate cancer cohort studies on symptom agreement. Agreement was better for observable than subjective treatment-related symptoms. Fatigue had a negative impact on the agreement. Patients usually graded their symptoms more severely than healthcare professionals. PROs should complement symptom assessment by healthcare professionals. Abstract: Introduction: Previous studies showed that healthcare professionals and patients had only moderate to low agreement on their assessment of treatment-related symptoms. We aimed to determine the levels of agreement in a large cohort of prostate cancer patients. Methods: Analyses were made of data from 1, 756 prostate cancer patients treated with external beam radiotherapy (RT) and/or brachytherapy in Europe and the USA and recruited into the prospective multicentre observational REQUITE study. Eleven pelvic symptoms at the end of RT were compared after translating patient-reported outcomes (PROs) into CTCAE-based healthcare professional ratings. Gwet's AC2 agreement coefficient and 95% confidence intervals were calculated for each symptom. To compare severity of grading between patients and healthcare professionals, percent agreement and deviations for each symptom were graphically depicted. Stratified and sensitivity analyses were conducted to identify potential influencing factors and to assess heterogeneity and robustness of results. Results: The agreement for the 11 pelvic symptoms varied from very goodHighlights: One of the largest prostate cancer cohort studies on symptom agreement. Agreement was better for observable than subjective treatment-related symptoms. Fatigue had a negative impact on the agreement. Patients usually graded their symptoms more severely than healthcare professionals. PROs should complement symptom assessment by healthcare professionals. Abstract: Introduction: Previous studies showed that healthcare professionals and patients had only moderate to low agreement on their assessment of treatment-related symptoms. We aimed to determine the levels of agreement in a large cohort of prostate cancer patients. Methods: Analyses were made of data from 1, 756 prostate cancer patients treated with external beam radiotherapy (RT) and/or brachytherapy in Europe and the USA and recruited into the prospective multicentre observational REQUITE study. Eleven pelvic symptoms at the end of RT were compared after translating patient-reported outcomes (PROs) into CTCAE-based healthcare professional ratings. Gwet's AC2 agreement coefficient and 95% confidence intervals were calculated for each symptom. To compare severity of grading between patients and healthcare professionals, percent agreement and deviations for each symptom were graphically depicted. Stratified and sensitivity analyses were conducted to identify potential influencing factors and to assess heterogeneity and robustness of results. Results: The agreement for the 11 pelvic symptoms varied from very good ( AC2 > 0.8: haematuria, rectal bleeding, management of sphincter control) to poor agreement ( AC2 ≤ 0.2: proctitis and urinary urgency). Fatigue had a negative impact on the agreement. Patients tended to grade symptoms more severely than healthcare professionals. Information on sexual dysfunction was missing more frequently in healthcare professional assessment than PROs. Conclusion: Agreement was better for observable than subjective symptoms, with patients usually grading symptoms more severely than healthcare professionals. Our findings emphasize that PROs should complement symptom assessment by healthcare professionals and be taken into consideration for clinical decision-making to incorporate the patient perspective. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Radiotherapy and oncology. Volume 178(2023)
- Journal:
- Radiotherapy and oncology
- Issue:
- Volume 178(2023)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 178, Issue 2023 (2023)
- Year:
- 2023
- Volume:
- 178
- Issue:
- 2023
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2023-0178-2023-0000
- Page Start:
- Page End:
- Publication Date:
- 2023-01
- Subjects:
- Agreement -- Adverse events -- Patient-reported outcomes -- Prostate cancer -- Radiotherapy
ADT Hormone therapy -- CTCAE Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events -- EBRT External beam radiotherapy -- ED Erectile dysfunction -- EORTC European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer -- LENT Late Effects of Normal Tissue -- PRO Patient-reported outcome -- RT Radiotherapy
Oncology -- Periodicals
Radiotherapy -- Periodicals
Tumors -- Periodicals
Medical Oncology -- Periodicals
Neoplasms -- radiotherapy -- Periodicals
Radiotherapy -- Periodicals
Radiothérapie -- Périodiques
Cancérologie -- Périodiques
Tumeurs -- Périodiques
Electronic journals
616.9940642 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/01678140 ↗
http://www.clinicalkey.com/dura/browse/journalIssue/01678140 ↗
http://www.clinicalkey.com.au/dura/browse/journalIssue/01678140 ↗
http://www.estro.org/ ↗
http://www.elsevier.com/journals ↗
http://www.journals.elsevier.com/radiotherapy-and-oncology/ ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1016/j.radonc.2022.11.015 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0167-8140
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 7240.790000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 25669.xml