Was Crustal Contamination Involved in the Formation of the Serpentine-Free Udachnaya-East Kimberlite? New Insights into Parental Melts, Liquidus Assemblage and Effects of Alteration. (9th July 2018)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Abersteiner, Adam; Kamenetsky, Vadim S; Golovin, Alexander V; Kamenetsky, Maya; Goemann, Karsten
• Is Part Of: Journal of petrology. Volume 59:Number 8(2018:Aug.)
• Page Start: 1467
• Page End: 1492
• Publication Date: 2018-07-09
• Subjects: alkali-carbonates -- chlorides -- kimberlite -- melt inclusions -- Udachnaya-East; Petrology -- Periodicals; 552
• DOI: 10.1093/petrology/egy068
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0022-3530

Abstract

Abstract: The petrologically unique Udachnaya-East kimberlite (Siberia, Russia) is characterised by unserpentinised and H2 O-poor volcaniclastic and coherent units that contain fresh olivine, along with abundant alkali-rich carbonates, chlorides, sulphides and sulphates in the groundmass. These mineralogical and geochemical characteristics have led to two divergent models that advocate different origins. It has been suggested that the unserpentinised units from Udachnaya-East are representative of pristine unaltered kimberlite. Conversely, the alkali-chlorine-sulphur enrichment has been attributed to interactions with crustal materials and/or post-emplacement contamination by brines. The mineralogical and geochemical features and the compositions of melt inclusions in unserpentinised and serpentinised Udachnaya-East kimberlite varieties are compared in this study. Both varieties of kimberlite have similar major, compatible and incompatible trace element concentrations and primitive mantle normalised trace element patterns, groundmass textures and silicate, oxide and sulphide mineral compositions. However, these two kimberlite varieties are distinguished by: (i) the presence of unaltered olivine, abundant Na–K–Cl–S-rich minerals (i.e. chlorides, S-bearing alkali-carbonates, sodalite) and the absence of H2 O-rich phases (i.e. serpentine, iowaite (Mg4 Fe 3+ (OH)8 OCl3(H2 O)) in unserpentinised samples, and (ii) the absence of alkali- and chlorine-enriched phases in the groundmass and characteristic olivine alteration (i.e. replacement by serpentine and/or iowaite) in serpentinised samples. In addition, melt inclusions hosted in olivine, monticellite, spinel and perovskite from unserpentinised and serpentinised kimberlite contain identical daughter phase assemblages that are dominated by alkali-carbonates, chlorides and sulphates/sulphides. This enrichment in alkalis, chlorine and sulphur in melt inclusions demonstrates that these elements were an intrinsic part of the parental magma. The paucity of alkali-carbonates and chlorides in the groundmass of serpentinised Udachnaya-East kimberlite is attributed to their instability and removal during post-emplacement alteration. All evidence previously used in support of crustal and brine contamination of the Udachnaya-East kimberlite is thoroughly evaluated. We demonstrate that 'contamination models' are inconsistent with petrographic, geochemical and melt inclusion data. Our combined data suggest that the Udachnaya-East kimberlite crystallised from an essentially H2 O-poor, Si–Na–K–Cl–S-bearing carbonate-rich melt.