Imminent death: clinician certainty and accuracy of prognostic predictions. Issue Volume 12:Issue e6(2022) (10th May 2019)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: White, Nicola; Reid, Fiona; Vickerstaff, Victoria; Harries, Priscilla; Tomlinson, Christopher; Stone, Patrick
• Is Part Of: BMJ supportive & palliative care. Volume 12:Issue e6(2022)
• Page Start: e785
• Page End: e791
• Publication Date: 2019-05-10
• Subjects: prognosis -- palliative care -- clinical decisions; Palliative treatment -- Periodicals; Terminal care -- Periodicals; 616.029
• DOI: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2018-001761
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2045-435X

Abstract

Abstract : Objectives: To determine the accuracy of predictions of dying at different cut-off thresholds and to acknowledge the extent of clinical uncertainty. Design: Secondary analysis of data from a prospective cohort study. Setting: An online prognostic test, accessible by eligible participants across the UK. Participants: Eligible participants were members of the Association of Palliative Medicine. 99/166 completed the test (60%), resulting in 1980 estimates (99 participants × 20 summaries). Main outcome measures: The probability of death occurring within 72 hours (0% certain survival−100% certain death) for 20 patient summaries. The estimates were analysed using five different thresholds: 50/50%, 40/60%, 30/70%, 20/80% and 10/90%, with percentage values between these extremes being regarded as 'indeterminate'. The positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV) and the number of indeterminate cases were calculated for each cut-off. Results: Using a <50% versus >50% threshold produced a PPV of 62%, an NPV of 74% and 5% indeterminate cases. When the threshold was changed to ≤10% vs ≥90%, the PPV and NPV increased to 75% and 88%, respectively, at the expense of an increase of indeterminate cases up to 62%. Conclusion: When doctors assign a very high (≥90%) or very low (≤10%) probability of imminent death, their prognostic accuracy is improved; however, this increases the number of 'indeterminate' cases. This suggests that clinical predictions may continue to have a role for routine prognostication but that other approaches (such as the use of prognostic scores) may be required for those cases where doctors' estimates are indeterminate.