Impact of coronary atherosclerotic plaque metrics and CT reader skills on inter-observer variation of repeated on-site CT-FFR. (8th February 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Vilades Medel, D; Bos, L; Jimenez Kockar, M; Altisent, O; Rodriguez, O; Alomar, X; Schuijf, J; Leta, R
• Is Part Of: European heart journal. Volume 22(2021)Supplement 1
• Publication Date: 2021-02-08
• Subjects: Cardiovascular system -- Imaging -- Periodicals; Heart -- Imaging -- Periodicals; 616.10754
• DOI: 10.1093/ehjci/jeaa356.249
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2047-2404

Abstract

Abstract: Funding Acknowledgements: Type of funding sources: None. Background and Purpose: Little is known about the on-site CT-FFR inter-reader reproducibility and its variability in different atherosclerotic plaque scenarios. The aim of this study was to determine the variation of repeated CT-FFR analyses between two CCTA readers with different training skills across different atherosclerotic features. Methods: Patients referred for invasive coronary angiography who accepted to undergo a CCTA/CT-FFR study were prospectively included. Patients with contraindications for CCTA, atrial fibrillation, chronic total occlusions or previous coronary revascularization were excluded. Quantification of atherosclerotic plaque metrics and CT-FFR was performed for each coronary vessel by two different CT readers, one Level I and one Level III. Inter-reader agreement for CT-FFR was assessed using kappa index, Bland-Altman and Lin's concordance correlation agreement (LCCA). The impact of each atherosclerotic feature was assessed by dividing the dataset based on the corresponding median and assessing inter-reader variability for both the lower and upper half. Results: 47 patients (137 vessels) were included. Mean age was 66 ± 10 years, 89% were males, 63% had hypertension, 76% dyslipidemia and 38% diabetes. Degree of stenosis was moderate (50-69%) in 29% and severe (≥70%) in 28% of vessels with a positive CT-FFR (≤0.80) in 39%. CT-FFR showed good correlation between the two readers based on a kappa index of 0.77 with a mean CT-FFR difference of -0.017 ± 0.12. The inter-reader agreement was good in the main epicardial vessels (LCCA of 0.70 for LAD, 0.74 for LCX and 0.76 for RCA, p < 0.001 for all) and better in proximal than in distal segments (LCCA of 0.83 vs 0.63, p < 0.001). Likewise, in different atherosclerotic plaque scenarios, the agreement was better in those vessels with lower plaque volume, less calcified and longer lesions (see table 1). Conclusions: In our cohort, on-site CT-FFR showed good inter-reader agreement without relevant impact by reader experience level and atherosclerotic plaque features.