Context counts: a qualitative study exploring the interplay between context and implementation success. Issue 7 (8th March 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Rogers, Lisa; De Brún, Aoife; Birken, Sarah A.; Davies, Carmel; McAuliffe, Eilish
• Is Part Of: Journal of health organisation and management. Volume 35:Issue 7(2021)
• Page Start: 802
• Page End: 824
• Publication Date: 2021-03-08
• Subjects: Teams -- Context -- Healthcare -- Implementation; Health services administration -- Periodicals; Health services administration -- Great Britain -- Periodicals; Health services administration -- Europe -- Periodicals; 362.106805
• DOI: 10.1108/JHOM-07-2020-0296
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1477-7266

Abstract

Abstract : Purpose: Implementing change in healthcare is difficult to accomplish due to the unpredictability associated with challenging the status quo. Adapting the intervention/practice/program being implemented to better fit the complex context is an important aspect of implementation success. Despite the acknowledged influence of context, the concept continues to receive insufficient attention at the team-level within implementation research. Using two heterogeneous multidisciplinary healthcare teams as implementation case studies, this study evaluates the interplay between context and implementation and highlights the ways in which context influences the introduction of a collective leadership intervention in routine practice. Design/methodology/approach: The multiple case study design adopted, employed a triangulation of qualitative research methods which involved observation (Case A = 16 h, Case B = 15 h) and interview data (Case A = 13 participants, Case B = 12 participants). Using an inductive approach, an in-depth thematic analysis of the data outlined the relationship between team-level contextual factors and implementation success. Findings: Themes are presented under the headings: (1) adapting to the everyday realities, a key determinant for implementation success and (2) implementation stimulating change in context. The findings demonstrate a dynamic relationship between context and implementation. The challenges of engaging busy healthcare professionals emphasised that mapping the contextual complexity of a site and adapting implementation accordingly is essential to enhance the likelihood of successful implementation. However, implementation also altered the surrounding context, stimulating changes within both teams. Originality/value: By exposing the reciprocal relationship between team-level contextual factors and implementation, this research supports the improved design of implementation strategies through better understanding the interplay and mutual evolution of evidence-based healthcare interventions within different contexts.