Epicardial adipose tissue volume improves cardiovascular risk reclassification: the Framingham Risk Score example. (14th October 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Sousa, J A; Mendonca, M I; Santos, M; Temtem, M; Mendonca, F; Sousa, A C; Rodrigues, M; Freitas, S; Henriques, E; Borges, S; Guerra, G; Drumond, A; Palma Dos Reis, R
• Is Part Of: European heart journal. Volume 42(2021)Supplement 1
• Publication Date: 2021-10-14
• Subjects: Imaging; Cardiology -- Periodicals; Heart -- Diseases -- Periodicals; 616.12005
• DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehab724.2527
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0195-668X

Abstract

Abstract: Introduction: Epicardial adipose tissue (EAT) volume can be noninvasively detected by CT and has been suggested to predict major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE). Framingham Risk Score is one of a number of scoring systems used to determine an individual's chances of developing cardiovascular disease, hence identifying who is most likely to benefit from prevention. Objectives: The purpose of this study was to determine net reclassification improvement (NRI) and improved risk prediction based on EAT volume, in comparison to a traditionally known cardiovascular risk score, such as the Framingham. Methods: 895 asymptomatic volunteers were prospectively enrolled in a single Portuguese center (mean age 51.9±7.7, 78.5% male) and underwent a median follow-up time of 3.7 years (IQR 5.0). EAT volume was measured by Cardiac Computed Tomography (CCT) using a modified simplified method. For NRI assessment, EAT volume as a continuous variable was added to the Framingham Risk Score. Results: After 3.7 median years of follow-up, 27 patients developed a MACE. Using NRI, the net proportion of events (netNRIe) that assigned a higher risk was 33.3% (better reclassified), and the net ratio of non-events (netNRIne) was 24.7%, resulting in a net reclassification index (netNRI) of 58.0%. When the new marker was included in the model, 58.0% of patients were better reclassified. In our work, a total of 33.3% of patients who suffered events (n=27) were correctly reclassified and assigned a higher risk. Conclusion: EAT volume results in a high reclassification rate in an asymptomatic, low-risk population, demonstrating the benefit of this marker beyond traditional risk assessment models. Our study supports its application, especially in carefully selected individuals. FUNDunding Acknowledgement: Type of funding sources: None.