Percutaneous left atrial appendage occlusion: impact on left atrial deformation indices. (14th October 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Dippenaar, A; Saaiman, J A; Heradien, M; Van Der Bijl, P
• Is Part Of: European heart journal. Volume 42(2021)Supplement 1
• Publication Date: 2021-10-14
• Subjects: Left Atrial Appendage (LAA) Closure; Cardiology -- Periodicals; Heart -- Diseases -- Periodicals; 616.12005
• DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehab724.2235
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0195-668X

Abstract

Abstract: Background: Percutaneous left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) is an accepted alternative to thromboprophylaxis in atrial fibrillation (AF) patients who are: i) intolerant to oral anticoagulation (OAC) (e.g. life-threatening haemorrhage), ii) non-adherent to OAC, or iii) at a high bleeding risk with OAC. Improvement in LA mechanics was shown post-LAAO in the LAFIT-LARIAT study, using the Lariat device (SentreHEART, Redwood City, CA, USA). No significant change was seen in LA mechanics after LAAO with the Watchman device (Boston Scientific, St. Paul, MN, USA) in the LAFIT-Watchman study. The impact of LAAO with the Amplatz or Amulet device (Abbot Vascular, St. Paul, MN, USA) on LA deformation mechanics, has not been investigated. Purpose: To evaluate the impact of LAAO with the Amplatz or Amulet device on echocardiographic LA deformation indices. Methods: All patients undergoing percutaneous LAAO from 2013 to 2021 at a single centre were included from an ongoing clinical registry. LA reservoir, conduit and contractile strain and strain rate were assessed with two-dimensional speckle tracking echocardiography from an apical four-chamber view. Conduit and contractile strain and strain rates were only recorded for patients without AF at the time of echocardiography. Changes in LA deformation indices over time were compared with a linear mixed model. Results: 32 LAAO recipients (mean age 72±12 years, 63% male) were analysed. 5 (16%) patients had AF pre- or post-procedure. After a mean follow-up of 17 months, the mean LA reservoir strain increased from 11.8±7.7% to 12.9±9.1% (P=0.49), the mean LA conduit strain increased from 6.8±6.0% to 8.0±7.4% (P=0.42) and the mean LA contractile strain decreased from 5.7±5.2% to 5.3±5.4% (P=0.77). During the same time interval, the mean LA reservoir strain rate decreased from 0.68±0.44/s to 0.64±0.47/s (P=0.70), the mean LA conduit strain rate increased from −0.52±0.43/s to −0.44±0.32/s (P=0.42) and the mean LA contractile strain rate decreased from −0.77±0.55/s to −0.83±0.53/s (P=0.66). Conclusions: No statistically significant improvement in LA mechanical function was seen after LAAO with the Amplatz or Amulet device, although a trend towards improved strain was observed for reservoir and conduit strain, with a worsening in contractile strain. Different LAAO devices therefore appear to have divergent effects on LA deformation, the clinical implications of which require further study. FUNDunding Acknowledgement: Type of funding sources: None.