Impact of telehealth in the outpatient management of atrial fibrillation during the COVID-19 pandemic. (14th October 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Shatla, I; Sammour, Y; Kennedy, K; Wimmer, A P
• Is Part Of: European heart journal. Volume 42(2021)Supplement 1
• Publication Date: 2021-10-14
• Subjects: Telehealth; Cardiology -- Periodicals; Heart -- Diseases -- Periodicals; 616.12005
• DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehab724.3107
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0195-668X

Abstract

Abstract: Background: The COVID-19 pandemic accelerated adoption of a telehealth model to replace outpatient visits. We studied quality indicators and clinical outcomes associated with virtual visits in comparison to in-person ambulatory visits for patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) seen by electrophysiology providers. Methods: Quality indicators and outcomes for patients with primary diagnosis of AF seen by electrophysiology providers (6 physicians and 4 nurse practitioners) for the 12 week period of March 22–June 13, 2020 were compared with those from the 12 week period of March 24–June 15, 2019. Result: We identified 2340 clinic visits for AF (1081 in 2019 and 1259 in 2020). Telehealth was not used in 2019, and was used in 90.5% of the 2020 visits. On multivariate analysis during 120 days following each encounter, there was no difference in hospital admissions between 2019 and 2020 (OR 0.89; 95% CI 0.69–1.14; p=0.3624), and there was trend towards lower emergency department visits in 2020 compared with 2019 (OR 0.77; 95% CI 0.6–1; p=0.0509). There were 36 deaths at 120 days, mortality was similar in 2020 as compared with 2019 (OR 1.5; 95% CI 0.74–3.03; p=0.2601). There was no difference in completed procedures including permanent pacemakers, cardiac resynchronization therapy devices, implantable cardioverter-defibrillators and catheter ablations. There was a significant difference in anticoagulant (OR 0.71; 95% CI 0.52–0.99; p=0.0412) and antiarrhythmic (OR 0.78; 95% CI 0.61–0.99; p=0.0384) dose adjustment or new prescriptions in 2019 compared with 2020. Conclusion: Telehealth was associated with similar intermediate-term clinical outcomes when compared to traditional ambulatory encounters. However, adjusting or providing new prescriptions for anticoagulant or anti-arrhythmic medications was more common with in-person than with virtual visits. FUNDunding Acknowledgement: Type of funding sources: None.