Regression-Adjusted Real-Time Quality Control. (6th September 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Duan, Xincen; Wang, Beili; Zhu, Jing; Zhang, Chunyan; Jiang, Wenhai; Zhou, Jiaye; Shao, Wenqi; Zhao, Yin; Yu, Qian; Lei, Luo; Yiu, Kwok Leung; Chin, Kim Thiam; Pan, Baishen; Guo, Wei
• Is Part Of: Clinical chemistry. Volume 67:Number 10(2021)
• Page Start: 1342
• Page End: 1350
• Publication Date: 2021-09-06
• Subjects: PBRTQC -- RARTQC -- SPC -- Laboratory Management; Clinical chemistry -- Periodicals; Pharmaceutical chemistry -- Periodicals; Biochemistry -- Periodicals; Biochimie -- Périodiques; Diagnostics biologiques -- Périodiques; Biochemistry; Clinical chemistry; Pharmaceutical chemistry; Biochemistry; Laboratory Techniques and Procedures; Klinische chemie; Periodicals; 616.075605
• DOI: 10.1093/clinchem/hvab115
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0009-9147

Abstract

Abstract: Background: Patient-based real-time quality control (PBRTQC) has gained increasing attention in the field of clinical laboratory management in recent years. Despite the many upsides that PBRTQC brings to the laboratory management system, it has been questioned for its performance and practical applicability for some analytes. This study introduces an extended method, regression-adjusted real-time quality control (RARTQC), to improve the performance of real-time quality control protocols. Methods: In contrast to the PBRTQC, RARTQC has an additional regression adjustment step before using a common statistical process control algorithm, such as the moving average, to decide whether an analytical error exists. We used all patient test results of 4 analytes in 2019 from Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, to compare the performance of the 2 frameworks. Three types of analytical error were added in the study to compare the performance of PBRTQC and RARTQC protocols: constant, random, and proportional errors. The false alarm rate and error detection charts were used to assess the protocols. Results: The study showed that RARTQC outperformed PBRTQC. RARTQC, compared with the PBRTQC, improved the trimmed average number of patients affected before detection (tANPed) at total allowable error by about 50% for both constant and proportional errors. Conclusions: The regression step in the RARTQC framework removes autocorrelation in the test results, allows researchers to add additional variables, and improves data transformation. RARTQC is a powerful framework for real-time quality control research.