Physical Therapy in Systemic Sclerosis: The Patient Perspective. Issue 1 (27th August 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Liem, Sophie I. E.; van Leeuwen, Nina M.; Vliet Vlieland, Thea P. M.; Boerrigter, Gerrie M. W.; van den Ende, Cornelia H. M.; de Pundert, Lian A. J.; Schriemer, Marisca R.; Spierings, Julia; Vonk, Madelon C.; de Vries‐Bouwstra, Jeska K.
• Is Part Of: Arthritis care & research. Volume 75:Issue 1(2023)
• Page Start: 145
• Page End: 151
• Publication Date: 2022-08-27
• Subjects: Arthritis -- Periodicals; Rheumatism -- Periodicals; 616.72
• DOI: 10.1002/acr.24741
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2151-464X

Abstract

Abstract : Objective: To assess the use, satisfaction, needs, and preferences regarding physical therapy (PT) in patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc). Methods: A total of 405 SSc patients, treated in the Leiden University Medical Center multidisciplinary care program and fulfilling American College of Rheumatology (ACR)/European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology (EULAR) 2013 SSc criteria, received a questionnaire containing 37 questions on use and satisfaction regarding PT over a 2‐year period, and their needs and preferences for future PT. Results: A total of 204 SSc patients (median age 63 years, 81% female) completed the questionnaire. One hundred twenty‐eight patients (63%) had used or were using PT in a primary care setting. For 39% of patients not using PT, lack of referral or lack of knowledge was the reason for not using it. The most frequently reported active treatments were muscle‐strengthening (n = 92 [72%]), range of motion (n = 77 [60%]), and aerobic exercises (n = 72 [56%]). Specific SSc hand‐ and mouth‐opening exercises were reported by 20 (15%) and 7 (6%) patients, respectively. Manual treatment (massage or passive mobilization) was reported by 83 patients (65%). The mean ± SD satisfaction score (range 0–10) was 8.2 ± 1.6. Regarding patients' needs, 96 patients (47%) of the total group wanted to receive more information concerning PT, and 128 (63%) wanted to continue, start, or restart PT in the near future, with 56 of the 128 patients (44%) favoring individual treatment on a continuous basis. Conclusion: We observed a significant variation in the use and content of PT for SSc patients in a primary care setting. Our results suggest potential underuse of PT care, in particular for hand and oral dysfunction, and underpin the need for initiatives to improve the quality and accessibility of PT care for SSc patients.