COVID‐19 infection: Positive mental health, psychological vulnerability and sex: Cross‐sectional study. Issue 1 (14th October 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Almeida, Cláudia Patrícia Pires; Novo, André Filipe Morais Pinto; Lluch Canut, Maria Teresa; Ferré‐Grau, Carme; Sequeira, Carlos Alberto da Cruz
• Is Part Of: Journal of nursing scholarship. Volume 55:Issue 1(2023)
• Page Start: 123
• Page End: 130
• Publication Date: 2022-10-14
• Subjects: pandemic -- positive mental health -- psychological vulnerability -- sex; Nursing -- Periodicals; Nursing -- United States -- Periodicals; 610.73
• DOI: 10.1111/jnu.12826
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1527-6546

Abstract

Abstract: Since mid‐March 2020, a state of emergency was decreed in Portugal due to the COVID‐19 pandemic and, consequently, measures were implemented to protect public health, such as social isolation, which will certainly have a notable impact on the mental health of the population, especially in the most vulnerable groups. Positive Mental Health (PMH) is essential to deal with adversity, in this case with the pandemic, and to live better and with greater satisfaction. We consider it relevant to investigate how PMH was used as a resource to deal with the pandemic, depending on the level of vulnerability and sex. A, cross‐sectional study was carried out whose the aim was to evaluate the levels of PMH and psychological vulnerability in people with COVOD‐19 infection and analyze the association between PMH and psychological vulnerability among men and women. Methods: The instruments used were a sociodemographic characterization questionnaire, the Positive Mental Health Questionnaire, and the Psychological Vulnerability Scale (PVS), that were sent and filled out online. A quantitative, cross‐sectional, descriptive, and correlational study was carried out. Results: After analyzing the results, it was found that approximately 50.4% of the respondents ( n = 387) had global PMH values that place them in quartile 50. There was also a statistically significant difference between female and male PMH, with women showing greater psychological vulnerability and lower overall PMH. Conclusions: We conclude that the women present a greater psychological vulnerability and a lower level of PMH when compared to men. Relevance to clinical practice: Considering the study's statistically significant results, when we talk about mental health, we should always consider the sex variable as a vulnerability factor, in a pandemic or non‐pandemic phase.