Patterns of initial colorectal cancer screenings after turning 50 years old and follow-up rates of colonoscopy after positive stool-based testing among the average-risk population. (2nd January 2023)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Austin, George; Kowalkowski, Henrik; Guo, Yinglong; Miller-Wilson, Lesley-Ann; DaCosta Byfield, Stacey; Verma, Prat; Housman, Laura; Berke, Ethan
• Is Part Of: Current medical research and opinion. Volume 39:Number 1(2023)
• Page Start: 47
• Page End: 61
• Publication Date: 2023-01-02
• Subjects: Colorectal cancer -- screening -- stool test -- trends -- retrospective; Clinical medicine -- Periodicals; Therapeutics -- Periodicals; 615.5
• DOI: 10.1080/03007995.2022.2116172
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0300-7995

Abstract

Abstract: Objectives: Effective colorectal cancer (CRC) screening requires proper adherence beginning at the recommended screening age. For those with positive results on stool-based tests (SBTs), a follow-up colonoscopy is warranted. The objectives of this study were to 1) examine initial screening rates after turning 50 years old; and 2) assess rates of follow-up colonoscopy after a positive SBT. Methods: This retrospective study used de-identified administrative claims data from 01/01/2006 to 06/30/2020 for commercially insured and Medicare Advantage enrollees. For objective 1, the index year was the year enrollees turned 50. Rates of CRC screening during and after the index year were captured. For objective 2, the index date was the claim date of a fecal immunochemical test (FIT) or multitarget stool DNA test (mt-sDNA) where linked lab data indicated a positive test result. Rates and time to follow-up colonoscopy after a positive SBT were assessed. Results: Approximately 53% of enrollees initiated CRC screening within five years after turning 50 (50+ cohort N = 718, 562). Among enrollees with an available lab result indicating a positive SBT ( N = 7329; 2110 FIT and 5219 mt-sDNA), overall follow-up colonoscopy within 6 months of the positive result was less than optimal (65%) and varied by modality; 72% vs 46% ( p < .001) among enrollees with a positive mt-sDNA test compared to FIT test, respectively. Conclusion: There is potential for improving CRC screening among the eligible average-risk population, both to start screening once they reach the screening-eligible age, and to complete the CRC screening paradigm after a positive stool-based screen.