WEARABLES REVEAL A GAP BETWEEN GAIT PERFORMANCE IN THE LAB AND DURING 24/7 MONITORING IN OLDER ADULTS. (8th November 2019)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- WEARABLES REVEAL A GAP BETWEEN GAIT PERFORMANCE IN THE LAB AND DURING 24/7 MONITORING IN OLDER ADULTS. (8th November 2019)
- Main Title:
- WEARABLES REVEAL A GAP BETWEEN GAIT PERFORMANCE IN THE LAB AND DURING 24/7 MONITORING IN OLDER ADULTS
- Authors:
- Hillel, Inbar
Avanzino, Laura
Cereatti, Andrea
Rikkert, Marcel Olde
Din, Silvia Del
Ginis, Pieter
Mirelman, Anat
Hausdorff, Jeffrey M - Abstract:
- Abstract: We compared in-lab usual-walking (UW) and dual-task walking (DTW) to daily-living measures of gait obtained during 24/7 monitoring. In-lab gait features (e.g., gait speed, step and stride regularity) derived from UW and DTW were compared to the same gait features during daily-living in 150 elderly fallers (age: 76.5±6.3 years, 37.6% men). Features were extracted from a lower-back accelerometer. In daily-living setting, subjects wore the device for one week and pre-processing detected 30-second walking bouts. A histogram of all walking bouts was determined for each walking feature for each subject, then each subject's typical, worst and best values were determined. Statistics of reliability were assessed using ICC and Bland-Altman. As expected, in-lab gait speed, step regularity, and stride regularity were worse during DTW, compared to UW. Gait speed, step regularity, and stride regularity during UW were significantly higher (i.e., better) from the typical daily-living values (p<0.0001) and different (p<0.000) from the worst and best values. DTW values tended to be similar to typical daily-living values (p=0.205, p=0.053, p=0.013 respectively). ICC assessment and Bland-Altman plots indicated that in-lab values do not reliably reflect the daily-walking values. Gait values during relatively long daily-living walking bouts are more similar to the corresponding values obtained in the lab during DTW, as compared to UW. Still, gait performance during most daily-livingAbstract: We compared in-lab usual-walking (UW) and dual-task walking (DTW) to daily-living measures of gait obtained during 24/7 monitoring. In-lab gait features (e.g., gait speed, step and stride regularity) derived from UW and DTW were compared to the same gait features during daily-living in 150 elderly fallers (age: 76.5±6.3 years, 37.6% men). Features were extracted from a lower-back accelerometer. In daily-living setting, subjects wore the device for one week and pre-processing detected 30-second walking bouts. A histogram of all walking bouts was determined for each walking feature for each subject, then each subject's typical, worst and best values were determined. Statistics of reliability were assessed using ICC and Bland-Altman. As expected, in-lab gait speed, step regularity, and stride regularity were worse during DTW, compared to UW. Gait speed, step regularity, and stride regularity during UW were significantly higher (i.e., better) from the typical daily-living values (p<0.0001) and different (p<0.000) from the worst and best values. DTW values tended to be similar to typical daily-living values (p=0.205, p=0.053, p=0.013 respectively). ICC assessment and Bland-Altman plots indicated that in-lab values do not reliably reflect the daily-walking values. Gait values during relatively long daily-living walking bouts are more similar to the corresponding values obtained in the lab during DTW, as compared to UW. Still, gait performance during most daily-living walking bouts are worse than that measured in-lab and do not reliably reflect each other. That is, an older adult's typical daily-living gait cannot be estimated by simply measuring walking in a structured, laboratory setting. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Innovation in aging. Volume 3(2019)Supplement 1
- Journal:
- Innovation in aging
- Issue:
- Volume 3(2019)Supplement 1
- Issue Display:
- Volume 3, Issue 1 (2019)
- Year:
- 2019
- Volume:
- 3
- Issue:
- 1
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2019-0003-0001-0000
- Page Start:
- S335
- Page End:
- S335
- Publication Date:
- 2019-11-08
- Subjects:
- Aging -- Periodicals
Gerontology -- Periodicals
612.67 - Journal URLs:
- https://academic.oup.com/innovateage ↗
http://www.oxfordjournals.org/ ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1093/geroni/igz038.1218 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 2399-5300
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 25601.xml