Characteristics and Outcomes of Prehospital Tourniquet Use for Trauma in the United States. (2nd January 2023)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Hashmi, Zain G.; Hu, Parker J.; Jansen, Jan O.; Butler, Frank K.; Kerby, Jeffrey D.; Holcomb, John B.
• Is Part Of: Prehospital emergency care. Volume 27:Number 1(2023)
• Page Start: 31
• Page End: 37
• Publication Date: 2023-01-02
• Subjects: 362.18
• DOI: 10.1080/10903127.2021.2025283
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1090-3127

Abstract

Abstract: Introduction: The use of the extremity tourniquet in military environments has reduced preventable deaths due to exsanguinating hemorrhage, leading to increased use in civilian settings. However, the outcomes of contemporary prehospital tourniquet use in civilian settings are not well-described nationally. The objective of this study was to describe the characteristics and outcomes following prehospital tourniquet use by emergency medical services (EMS) in the United States. Methods: All trauma activations reported to the National EMS Information System 2019 (NEMSIS) were included. Patients who had ≥1 tourniquet applied were identified. Descriptive analyses were used to compare characteristics between tourniquet and no-tourniquet cohorts. Coarsened exact matching was performed to generate a k2k match (on age, sex, lowest-systolic blood pressure, initial patient acuity, provider's initial impression, injury mechanism, and presence of upper/lower extremity injuries) and used to compare outcomes. Trauma patients who may have potentially benefited from tourniquet application (extremity injury, shock index ≥1 and no documented tourniquet application) were identified. Results: A total of 7, 161 tourniquets were applied among 4, 571, 379 trauma activations (1.6/1000 activations). Patients in the tourniquet cohort were younger (40 ± 18 vs 52 ± 26 mean ± SD years), more hypotensive (16.1% vs. 2.5%) and had higher initial acuity (65.0% critical/emergent vs. 20.6%) [ p < 0.01 for all]. A total of 7, 074 patients in the tourniquet cohort were matched with 7, 074 patients in the non-tourniquet cohort. Post-match analysis revealed that the patients in tourniquet cohort had a higher final acuity (80.8% vs. 75.0%, p < 0.01), lower scene-time (15.4 ± 13.6 vs. 17.0 ± 14.2 mean ± SD minutes, p < 0.01), and higher survival-to-hospital (83.6% vs. 75.1%, p < 0.01). A total of 141, 471 trauma patients who may have potentially benefited from tourniquet application were identified. Conclusion: Prehospital tourniquet use by EMS in the United States is associated with lower scene-time and improved survivability to hospital. Results indicate that patients might benefit from wider tourniquet use in the civilian prehospital setting.