Use of Negative Pressure Ventilation in Pediatric Critical Care: Experience in 56 PICUs in the Virtual Pediatric Systems Database (2009–2019). Issue 6 (June 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Moffitt, Cynthia A.; Deakins, Kathleen; Cheifetz, Ira; Clayton, Jason A.; Slain, Katherine N.; Shein, Steven L.
• Is Part Of: Pediatric critical care medicine. Volume 22:Issue 6(2021)
• Publication Date: 2021-06
• Subjects: acute respiratory failure -- bronchiolitis -- noninvasive ventilation; Pediatric intensive care -- Periodicals; Pediatric emergencies -- Periodicals; 618.05
• DOI: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000002690
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1529-7535

Abstract

Abstract : OBJECTIVES: Negative pressure ventilation may be more physiologic than positive pressure ventilation, but data describing negative pressure ventilation use in the PICU are limited. We aimed to describe the epidemiology and outcomes of PICU patients receiving negative pressure ventilation. DESIGN: Descriptive analysis of a large, quality-controlled multicenter database. SETTING: Fifty-six PICUs in the Virtual Pediatric Systems database who reported use of negative pressure ventilation. PATIENTS: Children admitted to a participating PICU between 2009 and 2019 who received negative pressure ventilation. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Among 788 subjects, 71% were less than 2 years old, and 45% had underlying health conditions. Two concurrent aspiration events were the only adverse events reported. After excluding one over-represented center, the 3 years with the most negative pressure ventilation usage were 2017–2019 (all > 25 cases/yr and ≥ 13 centers reporting usage). Among those 187 children, the most common primary diagnoses were bronchiolitis and cardiac disease (both 15.5%), 24.1% required endotracheal intubation after negative pressure ventilation, and 9.1% died. CONCLUSIONS: Negative pressure ventilation is being used in many PICUs, most commonly for pulmonary infections or cardiac disease, in children with high rates of subsequent intubation and mortality and with few documented adverse events. Use at individual centers is rare but increasing, suggesting need for prospective collaboration to better evaluate the role of negative pressure ventilation in the PICU.