Outcomes of radiosensitisation in elderly patients with advanced bladder cancer. Issue 3 (December 2018)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Christodoulou, Marianna; Reeves, Kimberley J.; Hodgson, Clare; Zeniou, Anthi; Slevin, Finbar; Kennedy, Jason; Hoskin, Peter J.; Henry, Ann; Choudhury, Ananya
• Is Part Of: Radiotherapy and oncology. Volume 129:Issue 3(2018)
• Page Start: 499
• Page End: 506
• Publication Date: 2018-12
• Subjects: Muscle invasive bladder cancer -- Radiotherapy -- Elderly -- Radiosensitisation; Oncology -- Periodicals; Radiotherapy -- Periodicals; Tumors -- Periodicals; Medical Oncology -- Periodicals; Neoplasms -- radiotherapy -- Periodicals; Radiotherapy -- Periodicals; Radiothérapie -- Périodiques; Cancérologie -- Périodiques; Tumeurs -- Périodiques; Electronic journals; 616.9940642
• DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2018.05.022
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0167-8140

Abstract

Abstract: Introduction: There is little evidence to guide treatment in elderly patients with muscle invasive bladder cancer (MIBC). We evaluated the efficacy and tolerability of concurrent radical radiotherapy with gemcitabine radiosensitisation (GemX) in elderly patients with MIBC and compared outcomes to those from the bladder carbogen and nicotinamide (BCON) phase III trial. Materials and methods: Data were retrospectively analysed for patients who received GemX from two oncology centres in the UK. Elderly was defined as aged ≥75 at the start of GemX. Following transurethral resection of bladder tumour, patients received neo-adjuvant platinum-based chemotherapy followed by radiotherapy concurrently with weekly gemcitabine. A separate, age-specific analysis was performed in the BCON cohort. Overall survival (OS), disease specific survival (DSS) and local progression free survival (LPFS) were evaluated using Kaplan–Meier methodology and Cox proportional hazards regression. Results: Out of 167 patients who received GemX, 61 were elderly (36.5%) with a median age of 78 years. Elderly patients had worse performance status ( p = 0.020) and co-morbidities ( p = 0.030). A similar proportion of patients received planned dose radiotherapy in both groups ( p = 0.260), although fewer elderly patients received all four cycles of concurrent chemotherapy ( p = 0.017) due to toxicity. For OS, age had some prognostic power; HR 1.04 (95% CI 1.00–1.08; p = 0.068). Overall survival and LPFS in elderly patients were comparable between CON and GemX (HR 1.13, 95% CI 0.69–1.85; p = 0.616 and HR 0.85, 95% CI 0.41–1.74; p = 0.659 respectively). Discussion: Radiosensitisation is safe and effective and should be considered for fit elderly patients with MIBC.