Integrase Strand Transfer Inhibitor Start or Switch Impacts Learning in Women With HIV. (15th April 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: O'Halloran, Jane A.; Wang, Kunbo; Spence, Amanda B.; Williams, Dionna W.; Dastgheyb, Raha; Fitzgerald, Kathryn C.; Kamkwalala, Asante R.; Maki, Pauline M.; Sharma, Anjali; Gustafson, Deborah R.; Milam, Joel; Weber, Kathleen M.; Adimora, Adaora A.; Ofotokun, Igho; Fischl, Margaret A.; Konkle-Parker, Deborah; Lahiri, Cecile D.; Sheth, Anandi N.; Xu, Yanxun; Rubin, Leah H.
• Is Part Of: Journal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes. Volume 86:Number 5(2021)
• Publication Date: 2021-04-15
• Subjects: women with HIV -- cognition -- learning -- antiretroviral therapy -- integrase strand transfer inhibitors; AIDS (Disease) -- Periodicals; Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome -- Periodicals; AIDS (Disease); Periodicals; 616.9792005
• DOI: 10.1097/QAI.0000000000002608
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1525-4135

Abstract

Abstract : Background: Integrase strand transfer inhibitors (INSTIs) are first-line regimens for HIV treatment. We aimed to examine their impact on cognitive performance and depressive symptoms in women with HIV (WWH). Setting: Women's Interagency HIV Study, a multisite, prospective, cohort study. Methods: WWH who started or switched to INSTI-based antiretroviral therapy (ART) and completed neuropsychological testing and the Center for Epidemiological Studies-Depression (CES-D) scale before and after INSTI start/switch were included in the analyses. Primary outcomes were demographically corrected cognitive domain T-scores. Linear mixed-effects models adjusted for relevant covariates were used to examine effects of start/switch of any INSTI and individual INSTI drugs on cognition and CES-D scores. Results: Six hundred thirty-nine WWH, median age 49 (interquartile range 12) years, 66% Black non-Hispanic, had neuropsychological and CES-D scale data before and after INSTI start/switch. Although 14% started INSTI-based ART, the remainder switched to INSTI-based ART from another regimen. Overall, any INSTI use was associated with poorer learning post-INSTI. Specifically, use of dolutegravir and elvitegravir, but not raltegravir, was associated with poorer learning. In analyses restricted to INSTI switch, any INSTI use, and dolutegravir use, was associated with poorer learning. Among those switching from a PI-based regimen, INSTIs overall and dolutegravir remained associated with poorer learning; switching from a nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor to dolutegravir was also associated with poorer learning. INSTI start/switch was not related to depressive symptom changes. Conclusions: INSTI use was associated with poorer learning among WWH. These changes were mainly observed in elvitegravir and dolutegravir users, indicating that the impact of INSTI on cognition in WWH may not be a class effect.